Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Why is Apple allowed to have closed App Store (Score 1) 47

It won't host them on the Google App Store.

Also, anything that is hosted on the Google App Store must only ever accept money through the app store, which rather prevents competing app stores on google from working even if they were allowed.

If they're from the vendor that provides your device, or you sideload them they're presumably less restricted.

Comment So many cynics! This is good news. (Score 1) 47

This is huge...if it survives appeal.

Google's app store is a vertical monopoly and quite obviously anti-competitive. (Apple's is too and a ruling here will make it easier to get a ruling aganst Apple)

The big winner hear is most likely to be Amazon -- which has had to remove purchase capabilities in Android in order to preserve their margin (and because negotiations on Google's "cut" failed, mostly because there was no fair cut). In general, the big winners will be, like Amazon, exisitng payment/financial or paid websites systems that have Android apps.

The status quo has them refuse to accept payment via apps or accept Google's/Apple's blackmail and give the phoneos companies a share of revenue, but Google does very little to earn this money.

Re alternative app stores, very few make sense, but there are places where marketplaces might have a good reason to exist. It would be lovely to have a vetted repo for Open Source Android apps, for instnace, rather than having to fiind sideloads or for all of them to pay App Store prices to distribute free software.

WRT the idea that scammers will be the big winners? Nothing in the ruling requires that Google not do fraud protection. Obviously, if people install (non-fraudulent) app stores, they might be at risk that the store does a worse job of vetting apps than the Google App store does, but it's not like Google has done a great job of preventing malware from getting downloaded.

Comment Not seeing the problem (Score 1) 128

Frankly, I don't see the difference between buying virtual cats on the blockchain and buying money on the blockchain. Either way, you're buying a unique artifact recorded on the blockchain whose value is entirely determined by demand and the coherence and continuence of this particular blockchain.

Once you lock it to a blockchain, what's the difference between a dollar and a cat, anyway? They're both bits of crypto-secured information.

Slashdot Top Deals

Everything that can be invented has been invented. -- Charles Duell, Director of U.S. Patent Office, 1899

Working...