On Sunday or Monday, I shared a "What is happening in Turkey" post, in English, from a Turkish friend's wall to my own. It was shared to "Friends except acquaintances" and got a few likes and comments. This morning I noticed it was gone from my wall. It is not to be found in my activity log, and the notifications of that it had been commented on were also gone.

I was starting to doubt I had posted it at all, when I remembered to check Google Reader (Yep, still running), as I ages ago had set up a RSS feed with my notifications there. There it was, "[Friend's name] likes your link", with a clickable link to facebook.com/my name/posts/ followed by a numerical value. However clicking on it gave this message: "This content is currently unavailable. The page you requested cannot be displayed right now. It may be temporarily unavailable, the link you clicked on may have expired, or you may not have permission to view this page". Other posts in my RSS feed works fine, so it was just this particular one.

If it wasn't for the RSS feed, I probably would have shrugged it off and thought no more of it, so I guess the RSS feature will be gone soon too.

I ended up with gscan2pdf and a rigid directory and filename structure. It works, but yeah, tags would be nice.

You tell me.
December 8: Iran responsible for 1998 U.S. embassy bombings
December 22: Judge: Iran, Taliban, al Qaeda liable for 9/11

I can't tell if they have decided yet, but I wouldn't rule out that this is the preparation of a narrative.

Boston Dynamics' PETMAN could do its own balancing two years ago.

The problem is that it is not "only supposed to be a document display". Someone gave a pretty good summary on Reddit about a month ago. The conclusion is that Adobe Reader is most likely overkill for 90% of the users, and you should stick to something like SumatraPDF or Foxit.

Aren't desktop firewalls useful in cases where attackers use malicious PDFs/Office documents/browser exploits to run reverse shells? If the exploit tries to connect to evilhost.com:443, how can a server firewall know that the connection is not a legitimate HTTPS connection?

As far as I understand, desktop firewalls would block attempts like these, as long as the connection isn't initiated by a whitelisted program. Of course the exploit payload could include methods to whitelist itself, but I assume there is no one single method to do this, so the payload would have to include custom methods for each of the personal firewall vendors.

Disclaimer: I have no experience with personal firewalls, and if I'm talking out of my ass, please correct me.

The Youtube video was posted January 12, 2008 :\

I think Sharepoint can do exactly what you are looking for. I haven't seen the "usable interface", though, as the installations I've tried has been quite messy web interfaces, but I'm sure it can be customized to no end.

CNN Live (a href="http://edition.cnn.com/live/">http://cnn.com/live/ works fine for me in Ubuntu, but thanks.