Comment Re:19% IPC boost (Score 3, Informative) 91
In the SPECint2017 suite, we’re seeing the new i7-11700K able to surpass its desktop predecessors across the board in terms of performance. The biggest performance leap is found in 523.xalancbmk which consists of XML processing at a large +54.4% leap versus the 10700K. The rest of the improvements range in the +0% to +15% range, with an average total geomean advantage of +15.5% versus the 10700K. The IPC advantage should be in the +18.5% range More interesting are the multi-threaded SPEC results. Here, the new generation from Intel is showcasing a +5.8% and +16.2% performance improvement over its direct predecessor. Given the power draw increases we’ve seen this generation, those are rather unimpressive results, and actually represent a perf/W regression. AMD’s current 6-core 5600X actually is very near to the new 11700K, but consuming a fraction of the power.
Comment Re:"Chaos" is overstated (Score 5, Informative) 207
Comment It is not the longest (Score 4, Informative) 53
Comment Re:Worst thing is... (Score 2) 106
McAfee Takes Six Months To Patch Remote Code Exploit In Linux VirusScan Enterprise (theregister.co.uk) 45
Citing the security note, CSO adds that "one of the issues affects Virus Scan Enterprise for Windows version 8.7i through at least 8.8." The vulnerability was reported by Andrew Fasano at MIT's federally-funded security lab, who said he targeted McAfee's client because "it runs as root, it claims to make your machine more secure, it's not particularly popular, and it looks like it hasn't been updated in a long time."
Comment Did Anyone Else (Score 0) 181
Comment Re:stop raping our children you fucking warmongers (Score 2) 192
we are 14 trillion fucking dollars in debt, and they want to spend it on fucking acronyms where they sit around building shit we cant sell to anyone. fuck these people.
No you are only off by 2.8 trillion it's 16.878 trillion
Comment Re:Dirty (Score 1) 260
Not that much. Sulfur, mercury, and lead kills people. C02 kills civilizations, so the emphasis is pretty much spot-on.
OSHA's maximum safe level is 3% (30,000 ppm) and 10% (100,000 ppm) is considered lethal so 400 ppm is no big deal.
Comment Re:Steambox (Score 2) 435
Comment 20 ms from the Twin Cities (Score 1) 558
Comment Re:I must be misunderstanding (Score 0) 162
Doesn't this just turn your EV into a less-efficient gasoline-powered vehicle?
There's a common misconception that because an EV puts out no emissions, that it's 100% clean. And that because electric motors are 80%-90% efficient, EVs are 80%-90% efficient.
That number conveniently ignores the battery efficiency.
So lets re run those number including every thing.
Fuel to electricity 40% ( Generation plant)
Transmission ~90%
Battery Depends on chemistry
NI-MH ~66%
Li-ion ~80-90%
NiCd ~70-90%
SOFC ~60%
DC Motor 75-92%
Bottom Line From fuel to road
Best case 30%
Wost case with current EV batteries 18%
Modern ICE 20-25%
SOFC EV 45%
Comment Re:Here's a novel idea (Score 1) 214