Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
The Internet

Submission + - SPAM: Why you won't recognize the Internet by 2020

alphadogg writes: As they imagine the Internet of 2020, computer scientists across the country are starting from scratch and re-thinking everything: from IP addresses to DNS to routing tables to Internet security in general. They're envisioning how the Internet might work without some of the most fundamental features of today's ISP and enterprise networks. Their goal is audacious: To create an Internet without so many security breaches, with better trust and built-in identity management. Researchers are trying to build an Internet that's more reliable, higher performing and better able to manage exabytes of content. And they're hoping to build an Internet that extends connectivity to the most remote regions of the world, perhaps to other planets. This high-risk, long-range Internet research will kick into high gear in 2010, as the U.S. federal government ramps up funding to allow a handful of projects to move out of the lab and into prototype. Indeed, the United States is building the world's largest virtual network lab across 14 college campuses and two nationwide backbone networks so that it can engage thousands – perhaps millions – of end users in its experiments.
Link to Original Source
Patents

Submission + - HP Patents Bignum Implementation From 1912 (blogspot.com)

I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property writes: "The authors of GMP (the GNU Multiple Precision Arithmetic Library) were invited to join Peer-to-Patent to review HP's recent patent on a very old technique for implementing bignums because their software might infringe. Basically, the patent claims choosing an exponent based on processor word size. If you choose a 4-bit word size and a binary number, you end up working in hexadecimal. Or for a computer with a 16-bit word and a base-10 number, you use base 10,000 so that each digit of the base-10,000 number would fit into a single 16-bit word. The obvious problem with that is that there's plenty of prior art here. Someone who spent a few minutes Googling found that Knuth describing the idea in TAOCP Vol 2 and other citations go back to 1912 (which did the same algorithm using strips of cardboard and a calculating machine). None of this can be found in the 'references cited' section. Even though the patent examiner did add a couple of references, they appear to have cited some old patents. The patent issued a few months ago, was filed back in October of 2004, and collected dust at the USPTO for some 834 days. It might seem amazing that there's prior art for a software patent from a time so long before computers as we know them existed, but it's not so amazing if you realize that computers are just automatic mathematicians that perform software as a mathematical calculation."
Space

Submission + - End of the road for NASA's Mars rover? (cosmosmagazine.com)

An anonymous reader writes: NASA celebrated Mars rover Spirit's bountiful, six-year stint on the red planet on Sunday – way longer than its forecast three-month mission. But it all may soon come to an end, stuck as it is in Martian sand.
The Internet

Submission + - Net users in Belarus may soon have to register. (msn.com)

Cwix writes: A new law proposed in Belarus would require all net users and online publications to register with the state. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34633201/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/

MINSK, Belarus — Belarus' authoritarian leader is promising to toughen regulation of the Internet and its users in an apparent effort to exert control over the last fully free medium in the former Soviet state. He told journalists that a new Internet bill, proposed Tuesday, would require the registration and identification of all online publications and of each Web user, including visitors to Internet cafes. Web service providers would have to report this information to police, courts and special services.


Idle

Submission + - 2009 Darwin Award Winners announced (darwinawards.com)

Greg Lindahl writes: From the woman who jumped in a swollen creek to rescue her drowning ... moped, to the man who hopped over the divider at the edge of the highway to take a leak, and plunged 65 feet to his death, 2009 was a year both exceptional and unexceptional for Darwin Award-worthy behavior!

Submission + - A decade's worth of IPv4 addresses (arstechnica.com) 1

An anonymous reader writes: There are 3,706,650,624 usable IPv4 addresses. On January 1, 2000, approximately 1,615 million (44 percent) were in use and 2,092 million were still available. Today, ten years later, 2,985 million addresses (81 percent) are in use, and 722 million are still free. In that time, the number of addresses used per year increased from 79 million in 2000 to 203 million in 2009. So it's a near certainty that before Barack Obama vacates the White House, we'll be out of IPv4 address. (Even if he doesn't get re-elected.)
Government

Accountability of the Scientific Stimulus Funding 242

eldavojohn writes "A blog tipped me off to a government site that allows me to see where my tax dollars went when the nebulous 'scientific stimulus' was granted. You might be able to find this information in a bill, but you can click on your state in this interactive site to see what has happened locally to you. Perhaps it's a sign of more government transparency in regards to spending or just more propaganda."
Communications

Internet Slower Than Rat, Horse, Rabbit, and Dog 6

An anonymous reader writes "CNET demonstrates that the internet is actually slower than every major animal. It's even slower than the apocryphal tortoise over a mile. In order to prove this they 'pitted the world's top animals against the Web over a one-mile course, transferring 32GB of data.' The results of the experiment showed the Internet to be the worst way to transfer data over short distances. 'If you put 32GB of data on a bite-proof USB key and strapped it to a cheetah, for example, it would be available to read at the destination 11 times faster than the Internet. The cheetah takes 30.9 minutes, the Internet over 6 hours!' Pigeon, horse and dog also perform very well at transferring 32GB of data, and even the lowly rat is over 8 times faster than the internet. CNET suggests the internet 'should hang its head in shame over its ranking in the one-mile speed test.'" Since it's already been proven that a pigeon was faster, I guess it was time to quantify mammals.

Comment The floor (Score 1) 576

Most of my books either end up under my bed when I'm not using them, or swap between my bed and my chair according to what I'm doing when I'm not using them. (I really need an l-shaped desk, because the half that's not where I am is useless, because my arms aren't monster-length.)

I'm also rather averse to owning stuff in general, so Ionly have a few that are special, and borrow the rest as Ineed them. (Owning stuff is so much work when you move or whatever, plus involves effort when buying them. It's not some philosophical objection, it's just not something Ienjoy/want at this stage of my life.)

Comment Re:feign ignorance... (Score 1) 606

Indeed. I don't feign ignorance; I am ignorant. I can use Debian GNU/Linux as a desktop to some extent: at least insofar as it's set up on my computer. I can poke at a Macintosh and until, omg, somehow something I did randomly made it work. I can yell at Ubuntu until it becomes like my Debian. But I can't use Windows at all any more; your average person knows more about how to make it work than me.

That said, I'm becoming less and less of a computer person as each day goes by, since I decided it would be so much more fun to be a luddite. But I'm still (or even more) a geek: I still check Slashdot, but only for the polls.

Comment Re:Who writes these things? (Score 1) 517

"Googling" is a standard term, and complaining about it is like complaining about people who fail to inflect adjectives according to gender.[*] Most phones with internet access are a bugger to use. At least, I've never been able to work out how to do it on any of mine (usually they hang). The iPhone isn't the first one to make it easy, but it's the most well-known, and they're all from about the same time.

[*]: Once upon a time---we're talking about a millenium ago, almost---you would through unsilent e's to the ends of most adjectives if they were refering to a noun in the feminine case. This is one reason why Middle English texts appear to have a lot of random silent e's thrown in for goode measure.

Comment Re:A Waste? (Score 1) 309

At least incarcerated people can get their freedom back (even if not the years they've lost). Dead people can't get their life back. Anyway, I doubt anyone (here at least) would hold America's prison system up as a model for foreign nations to aspire to. It's not as bad as the Chinese, but there's definitely scope for much improvement.

Comment Re:Maybe it does (Re:Something doesn't add up) (Score 1) 95

But if we use a logarithmic scale instead of a linear one...

(i.e. just because someone drew a graph that makes it look a bit like there's a relationship, just means someone manipulated the data to make it look like there's a relationship. It's one of the things you learn to do in the pesky statistics classes they make you take when you're a gradstudent so that you can get your papers published in journals. Of course, your real audience has all taken the same pesky classes and simply "unmanipulates" the data when they read the graph, so the only people who actually fall for it a commoners like you. But its commoners we get our money from, so we're quite happy.)

Comment Re:Lake Wobegon Effect (Score 1) 520

I can tell you north in the southern hemisphere without even thinking about it, and I'm always pretty much accurate (unless I'm lost in shopping centre or something). But this is all approximate and heuristic -- like when a good cook pours out two cups of flour and it turns out it is almost two cups of flour. Practice, not knowledge/algorithms. In the northern hemisphere, I have no idea. I can keep myself oriented, but I can't even pick south and call it "north" anymore (when I first got here, I could tell which direction was south so I just held maps upside-down, but now that doesn't help any more.) These days, I just define a particular direction as "I'll call this direction north to keep myself sane". In my current town it's actually north east, which isn't so bad.

(As for remembering directions and stuff, yeah I can do that without a problem. Possibly I'm excellent at it. Which is why I feel alarmed that I can't tell where North is; it's a bit like walking around without a clock.)

Slashdot Top Deals

"If you want to eat hippopatomus, you've got to pay the freight." -- attributed to an IBM guy, about why IBM software uses so much memory

Working...