Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Medicine

Renowned Geneticist Analyzes Consumer DNA Tests 97

pdragon04 sends in the hardly surprising news that direct-to-consumer genetic testing isn't predicting diseases as well as they claim. "...[Francis] Collins, who played a central role in the Human Genome Project and is rumored to be the next head of the National Institutes of Health, announced at the Consumer Genetics Conference in Boston last week that he had had his genome analyzed [using a made-up name] by the big three of direct-to-consumer genetic testing: 23andMe, Navigenics, and DecodeMe. Collins said that sequence-wise, the tests 'appear to be highly accurate': there were almost no differences in the genotype information generated in the three different analyses. But there were significant differences in the numbers of genetic variations used to calculate disease risk, as well as the final risk score. ... For example, one company used 5 single nucleotide polymorphisms, or SNPs, to calculate risk for a particular disease, pronouncing Collins at low risk. Another used 10 SNPs, placing him at high risk, and the third used 15, concluding that he is at average risk."

Comment Re:What is it with Heinlein? (Score 1) 116

It's not so much about Heinlein. I don't think he would've minded. It's just that awarding prizes for commercialization is a bit redundant, since commercialization usually leads to it's own reward - cold, hard cash. Let's just stick to giving awards to the people who do a lot of hard work that doesn't have a chance of making them filthy rich in the process but benefits Progress, Humankind or [insert Grand Word].

Slashdot Top Deals

Reality must take precedence over public relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled. -- R.P. Feynman

Working...