Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Space is hard (Score 1) 32

>SpaceX rockets failed repeatedly before getting it right

They didn't, though. There is a HUGE difference between test flights and production flights.

Falcon 1 scheduled several test flights. This where test flights, designed as such, and carrying accordingly mass-simulators, broken satellites, or a bloody wheel of cheese. Their first few failed, which was expected, and not a concern, as this are test flights. Then they reached orbit succesfully, and so they went into production. Their next flight was a production flight, and worked flawlessly too.

Then Falcon 9 came, which worked flawlessly on their first flight, and flew flawlessly for 5 straight years. They had ONE in-flight failure with 1.1, then absolutely none since FT. So 8 years of flawless launches, almost 200 of them too.

Comment Re:Cheap, efficient on-demand launch. (Score 3, Interesting) 32

Virgin Orbit offers expensive, inconvenient, unreliable launches.

For instance, Electron costs *half* of what a LauncherOne will cost you, and RocketLab is more reliable, has more launches under their belt, and offers a fantastic truly customer-oriented system.

The supposed advantages of air-launch aren't such. First of all, it's for the most part a lie. "It's just a plane, so we can launch anywhere". Well, except you do need pretty much all facilities except for a launch tower at your airport. And you need authorizations from everyone, from the FAA to the airport itself, local authorities, etc. Launching from another country? Even more bureaucracy. And it'll only be ok if it's a NATO country and the US gives the Ok for it (because ITAR). So all of those advantages evaporate fairly quickly.

If you want cheaper, and your orbit allows it, you can get on a SpaceX ridesharing mission. Anywhere from 300k to around 2 to 3 million for the max payload capacity that LauncherOne can handle. And you're launching on the most reliable rocket in history.

The problem with their last launch is a fundamental flaw, not necessarily on design, but on how they do things. Their processes are horrible. Sure, they aren't the same company as Virgin Galactic now, but they used to be, and they obviously inherited the same culture.

VO was already not very appealing, but now there are even more options, and more are coming. VO hasn't gone the way of Astra yet for the same reason BO isn't out of business: A big ego with big pockets behind it.

Comment Re:I don't understand why anyone is working on thi (Score 1) 40

Generally, I agree with your sentiment, but also "letting them get away with it" is a bad precedent. We've already seen similar efforts from microsoft, and from other manufacturers. Apple isn't the first, nor will be the last, to try and lock down a platform.

Breaking whatever BS protection they throw at it and doing what you want with the platform is exercising your right to use your own stuff however the hell you want. It's like the US flying over what China claims as the South China Sea. Basically, use it or lose it.

Comment Re:It's "Crew 6", not 6 crew. (Score 1) 45

That is correct. The first mission to carry humans for NASA wasn't a production mission, and so it was called Demo-2 (after Demo-1, which did everything but without people onboard). After that, Crew 1 through 6. So it's the 7th mission *for NASA*. In addition, they also flew Axiom 1 and Inspiration 4.

So, 1 manned demo mission, 6 missions for NASA in the main contract, "Crew" series, 1 for Axiom, 1 private, for a grand total of 9 missions with crew onboard so far.

Comment Re: So... not to be "that guy", but... (Score 0) 387

Female children should be married (owned by) a man. You're a white, so you disagree: your god is "MUH WHOITE WUHMAN"

(YHWH allows child brides, including in cases of rape (taphas): Devarim
chapter 22, verse 28 (Hebrew Masoretic Text: Na'ar (child), Greek
Septuagint: Padia (child, root word for paedophile), Latin Vulgate:
Puella)

Comment Re:That's a horseshit argument, by the way (Score 0) 387

> (when laws related to copyright and licensing are followed) keeps these works available in perpetuity.

Nope. The US copyright statute has a statutory provision that allows the Author of a work to recover copyright after 35 years. (I know you don't believe me, but you're a layperson idiot)

Also Nope: free licenses are revocable by the copyright owner in the USA.

And: Yes: I am a lawyer.

> For legal articles and treatises that agree: no consideration from GPL
> free-taker, no contract, revocable by the copyright holder:
scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/1857/
www.amazon.com/Open-Source-Licensing-Software-Intellectual/dp/0131487876
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=243237

> For easy to read by lay-people discussions on this topic:
lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/4/334
lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/3/698
lkml.org/lkml/2018/9/20/444

Comment Re:27 shaming murderers, that should go to prison. (Score 0) 387

>You are from the same class as child rapists,

>(YHWH allows child brides, including in cases of rape (taphas): Devarim
chapter 22, verse 28 (Hebrew Masoretic Text: Na'ar (child), Greek
Septuagint: Padia (child, root word for paedophile), Latin Vulgate:
Puella)

Ofcourse, a white would oppose this, since whites worship women and reject YHWH.

Comment Prophet attacked by cattle. (Score 0) 387

>I dislike how quickly everyone is emulating the CCCP/CCP.

Whites hate anyone that likes cute young girl children as brides. Such thoughts are against the interests of "MUUHH WHOITE WUUUHHHHHHNMMMANNNN" and are anathema to the white pieces of shit.

Proud Jewish Prophets have always been pro-child bride, going back millenia.
>(YHWH allows child brides, including in cases of rape (taphas): Devarim
chapter 22, verse 28 (Hebrew Masoretic Text: Na'ar (child), Greek
Septuagint: Padia (child, root word for paedophile), Latin Vulgate:
Puella)

The whites have decided that RMS probably likes cute young girls (because of his past comments on paedophillia), and thus must die or be canceled. Whites are heretics.

RMS is our Software Prophet.

Comment Where is RMS? (Score 0) 44

>I dislike how quickly everyone is emulating the CCCP/CCP.

Whites hate anyone that likes cute young girl children as brides. Such thoughts are against the interests of "MUUHH WHOITE WUUUHHHHHHNMMMANNNN" and are anathema to the white pieces of shit.

Proud Jewish Prophets have always been pro-child bride, going back millenia.
>(YHWH allows child brides, including in cases of rape (taphas): Devarim
chapter 22, verse 28 (Hebrew Masoretic Text: Na'ar (child), Greek
Septuagint: Padia (child, root word for paedophile), Latin Vulgate:
Puella)

The whites have decided that RMS probably likes cute young girls (because of his past comments on paedophillia), and thus must die or be canceled. Whites are heretics.

RMS is our Software Prophet.
.

Slashdot Top Deals

How many NASA managers does it take to screw in a lightbulb? "That's a known problem... don't worry about it."

Working...