America wasn't founded as a totalitarian socialist Hell-state.
Three major events destroyed America:
After the Civil War, America was no longer America politically.
After the New Deal, America was no longer America economically.
After the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, America was no longer America demographically.
Those of us with political leanings similar to those of the Koch brothers were not responsible for any of that. Your side was.
My neighbors are Poor. 30 years old, 5 kids.
So your neighbors made the same mistake five different times, and you want me to pay for it?
I thought I wanted well regulated economic institutions, so we all can get on with our businesses without fearing undue risk with our protected money.
Regulation of the sort that "progressives" want allows those like Jon Corzine, who've made frequent use of the revolving door between regulator and regulated, to steal and piss away hundreds of millions of dollars of customer money. Even worse are the neo-Keynesian shenanigans that pass for fiscal and monetary policy, which have greatly devalued the purchasing power of ordinary Americans.
So if it was justified to kill innocent people in Japan, you're also implying that it would've been further justified to kill innocent people in the USA?
As the US was not the aggressor nation in that conflict, any attacks on the US for using the atomic bombs would be illegitimate.
You too deserve to be shot, for treason.
Sorry, but I'm not levying war against the US, nor am I giving aid and comfort to its enemies.
For example, the slippery slope of Federal gun control that existed for 70 years between 1934 and 2004 which is merely stalled for now, and the slippery-slope that currently exists in places like California and New York.
It's not a fallacy if the slippery slope has repeatedly been demonstrated to actually exist.
You produce an obscene amount of the carbon footprint of the planet, polluting the whole globe and doing a great deal to rush us all to oblivion.
So basically, you want Americans murdered for building and producing stuff - stuff that you use every fucking day.
You and your family ought to be killed.
This is supported by reality, where socialized health care has demonstrably superior outcomes for lower cost than private healthcare.
"Superior outcomes" such as the Liverpool care pathway in Britain, under which 29 percent of hospital patients die under heavy sedation of otherwise treatable illnesses after being withheld food and water (in other words, they're murdered)? Or maybe they receive "superior outcomes" in the Netherlands, where ten percent of hospital patients die under similar circumstances?
So you prefer a government where the majority is disenfranchised? Like North Korea, or more like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, or Bahrain?
Strawman arguments make you look stupid. I would prefer that only property owning male heads of households be allowed to vote.
You can't get laid because you're a misogynist. Your defective sociapathy doesn't have much to do with the government, or with women having the choice to ignore your dumb, bigoted ass -- they're just reminded of how thankful they are to live in a relatively free country when you are around. I recommend a personality and a little bit of self introspection. It will get you further than those bizarre talking points.
Oh look; the rabbit person, confronted with a cold hard reality he can't deal with, launches into ad-hominem.
The fact of the matter is, civilization is built and maintained by men - either smart, wealthy, or both - and passed down from father to son. This requires patriarchy and the keeping of female sexuality in check.
But of course, all these social restraints have been destroyed. Enjoy the collapse of civil society and your Turd World governance.
The correct answer to ineffective government is effective government.
You can't have halfway decent government when the idiot majority is enfranchised, and when female emancipation and the destruction of patriarchal marriage means that men no longer have any incentive to invest in the future.
Things will also get worse for the families of these "law enforcement" agents: remember Dorner? Add to that the growing Hispanic population and we should expect to see more Latin American-style assassinations and terror directed at the lower-level cops. Some say this is already starting to happen in the Southwest.
And then they have the pathological gall to explicitly express that their rights are being trampled upon if someone suggests that gay people should have the same rights as everyone else.
Homosexuals already have all the natural rights that any other man has. What they are demanding goes far beyond that. They demand laws mandating that people be forced to associate with them. They demand laws mandating that elementary school students be taught about their "relationships" (and that's the best case scenario). They demand laws against speech and writings that make them "uncomfortable". All these laws are selectively enforced against heterosexual employed white males.
So yes, the rights of people like me are being trampled upon, and no, homosexuals aren't merely seeking "equal rights".
My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells down by the seashore.
