Only 1.5% of the workforce work on agriculture. That doesn't seem very rural to me.

That's not how GDP works at all. GDP is the (estimated) value of the total worth of a country’s production and services, calculated over the course on one year. It can be calculated in several ways, but the main point you are missing is that net income of A, B and C is zero.

I would appreciate if you tell me where.

Same in Liechtenstein (remember the Liechtenstein tax evasion scandal of 2008?). That's why numbers provided by both countries are to be taken with a grain of salt, to say the least.

Data is from CIA's world factbook, you can check it yourself. When talking about countries, I assumed we were speaking about GDP (and not GPD as I incorrectly spelled), but even if we are talking about people's income, gross domestic product per capita at purchasing power parity is indeed the best approximation I can think of for comparing average incomes in different countries like San Marino, where not much data (like median household income, GNI index, etc.) is available. Even though GDP is not equivalent to income, they are related, and given than Liechtenstein's GDP's is not 5% or 10% higher than San Marino's, but about three times higher, unless confronted with more data I think it's safe to conclude that the Liechtensteiners are wealthier than Sammarineses as an average. Of course, wealth can be (and probably is) distributed unequally so that almost nobody have an average income.

BTW I have always been interested in the history and economy of these tiny European countries, and I usually find very little information about the latter, so If you have any more info about the economy of San Marino please share a link or two ;) thank you!

I heard Switzerland is doing quite all-right with four different official languages, and they are a tiny country.

I don't think so. San Marino's GPD per capita is about 55,400 USD (or even as "little" as 36,000 USD according to CIA), while countries such as Luxembourg or Qatar have a GPD per capita of more than 80,000 USD, and some sources claim that Liechtenstein's GPD per capita is more than 140,000 USD. San Marino is a rich country, but by far not the richest.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analogy

they*

That may or may not be true, as there have been no trial (apart from one in Spain where there were acquitted).

Actually a Spanish court ruled that rojadirecta didn't break any -Spanish- law.

Also, they were already acquitted in Spain.

I've got a lot of things to hide, only they are not illegal.

I actually did install Linux to prevent video games. It doesn't work: you still have slashdot to prevent any kind of work to be done.

Canards still exist, for instance the Eurofighter has a fully articulated horizontal stabilizer on the front.

I don't trust common sense since earth is not flat

That's the main point of the article. Currently, as clearly shown by every statistics energy consumption is constantly growing (with a small "pause" during the ongoing crisis depending on the country). The author just states that this energy consumption grow cannot continue for much. He does not say that that means the end of civilization, nor necessarily an economical disaster. On the contrary he says that:

So he just points, with very good arguments, that "continued growth in energy use becomes physically impossible within conceivable timeframes".

In Spain private copy (and file sharing) is also legal and had always been. Then they introduced the "private copy tax" you speak about, of course not to keep private copy legal, but because it was infeasible to change the law in regards to that, and a way to monetize the situation was needed by the powers that be.
Fortunately, the EU ruled the tax was illegal. And later some members of the SGAE (Spanish RIAA) were arrested for embezzlement of the money obtained by such tax.
I ignore what's the current situation, but given the fact that wikileaks revealed US pressures to the Spanish government to change the copyright laws, I'm assuming these victories won't last long.