| Subject | Datestamp | Replies | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Re:Automated test in is a minimum | ||||||
| Re:Standards Committees on Common Sense | ||||||
| Re:Standards | ||||||
| Re:Curse my typos! | ||||||
| Re:I see a bunch of whiners | ||||||
| Re:Then participate! | ||||||
| Re:just like ISO 9000, that worked well! | ||||||
| Re:Shades of 2167 | ||||||
| Re:Which Michael Bolton? | ||||||
| Re:Standards | ||||||
| Re:Most likely against it... | ||||||
| Re:Wrong focus? | ||||||
| Re:Can it be a *useful* standard | ||||||
| Re:I see a bunch of whiners | ||||||
| Re:Wrong focus? | ||||||
| Re:Which Michael Bolton? | ||||||
| Re:Automated test in is a minimum | ||||||
| Re:Which Michael Bolton? | ||||||
| attached to Can ISO 29119 Software Testing "Standard" Really Be a Standard? | ||||||
| Elvis lives! | ||||||
| attached to DesqView/X: Night of the Living Dead Codebases | ||||||
Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. -- Pablo Picasso