Subject Datestamp Replies Score
Re:Automated test in is a minimum  *Wednesday September 03, 2014 @05:02PM  1
Re:Standards Committees on Common Sense  *Wednesday September 03, 2014 @04:39PM  1
Re:Standards  *Wednesday September 03, 2014 @04:34PM  1
Re:Curse my typos!  *Wednesday September 03, 2014 @04:31PM  1
Re:I see a bunch of whiners  *Wednesday September 03, 2014 @04:28PM  2
Re:Then participate!  *Wednesday September 03, 2014 @04:16PM 1 1
Re:just like ISO 9000, that worked well!  *Wednesday September 03, 2014 @04:00PM 1 1
Re:Shades of 2167  *Wednesday September 03, 2014 @03:56PM 1 1
Re:Which Michael Bolton?  *Wednesday September 03, 2014 @03:53PM  1
Re:Standards  *Wednesday September 03, 2014 @03:50PM 1 1
Re:Most likely against it...  *Wednesday September 03, 2014 @02:24PM  1
Re:Wrong focus?  *Wednesday September 03, 2014 @02:22PM  2
Re:Can it be a *useful* standard  *Wednesday September 03, 2014 @01:10PM  2
Re:I see a bunch of whiners  *Wednesday September 03, 2014 @01:03PM 2 1
Re:Wrong focus?  *Wednesday September 03, 2014 @12:51PM 1 1
Re:Which Michael Bolton?  *Wednesday September 03, 2014 @12:48PM 1 1
Re:Automated test in is a minimum  *Wednesday September 03, 2014 @11:52AM  1
Re:Which Michael Bolton?  *Wednesday September 03, 2014 @11:48AM 2 2
   attached to Can ISO 29119 Software Testing "Standard" Really Be a Standard?
Elvis lives!  *Monday January 28, 2002 @02:39PM  1
   attached to DesqView/X: Night of the Living Dead Codebases