Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Trust the World's Fastest VPN with Your Internet Security & Freedom - A Lifetime Subscription of PureVPN at 88% off. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. ×

Comment Re:Note to AMD: We don't care (Score 1) 206

I agree that AMD solution is better for high-end processing. But what percentage of customers need that extra few % of performance that a true QC would derive vs 2xDC? What percentage of customers need the extra % of performance of Core2 2xDC vs Core2 Quad?

This is definately a marketing move, this will sure help regain market share. But it's also a technical move, due to the fact if I bought a Xeon5100 server, When this system starts to bog down, I can go from 4 cores to 8 cores relatively painlessly.

This is also only a stop gap solution, as Intel is coming out with a true QC later in '07. They are already working on a replacement technology for the current FSB, like AMD's approach - CSI (I believed it was named)

Intel is working on multiple fronts simultaneously - 2xDC; QC; multiple FSBs on server mobos; 45n; Geneseo, CSI, etc ...

Although I'm a self-pronounced Intel fan boy, I can clearly see the technical superiority of AMD's approach. Intel also is following AMD's lead, as well as the other way around.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Don't worry about people stealing your ideas. If your ideas are any good, you'll have to ram them down people's throats." -- Howard Aiken

Working...