Comment Re:Defend it or lose it (Score 1) 577
I believe this also applies to patents. In any case, I was wondering if it did apply to copyright. Two people say no. Does anyone claim to be authoritative on this question?
I believe this also applies to patents. In any case, I was wondering if it did apply to copyright. Two people say no. Does anyone claim to be authoritative on this question?
Dude. The Irony Light was brilliantly illuminated. 1000s of years in this world is really only a few orbits of the Earth around the sun.
Isn't there some legal precedent for copyright not having been defended over a period of time making the copyright moot? Clearly people have been implementing Java APIs for 1000s of years without law suits from Oracle or Sun. It is only recently that Oracle has decided to go after Google (specifically acquiring Sun to do so?) that these suits have been brought. Doesn't it make the suits baseless simply because of the fact of Sun/Oracle's ignoring the issue for so many years previous?
As much as I want the model proposed in the article to be successful (it would be the best scenario AFAICT), remember Cyan's Uru? That was precisely the model, and they failed miserably because there wasn't enough adoption to keep them afloat.
I have a TiVo HD (series 3) and pay $100 per year for it. I rent a cable card from Comcast for $3/month and it allows both of my tuners to record simultaneously.
I have what you have, and it's costing me $15.50 a month + the cost of the TiVo. I love the UI of the TiVo and really LOATHE the Comcast DVR's - with which I am very familiar due to my girlfriend working at Comcast and getting one for free.
Why be a man when you can be a success? -- Bertolt Brecht