Comment Re:Photons (Score 1) 268
So in this scenario, are they then combining the two types of mass to account for 100%? The type of mass that accounts for 95% of the particle is the energy given off from gluons and quarks, which is a relativistic mass since movements and interactions don't have intrinsic mass? But the intrinsic mass of quarks makes up 5%?
Or is saying that 95% of its mass "comes from the energy from the movements and interactions of quarks and gluons" just another way of saying there's other stuff in there that must have mass, we just haven't identified them yet? Aren't they confusing various definitions of mass to explain the total mass which they think should be there?