Comment Re:Diminished Value? (Score 0) 481
These people are either crackheads are on a quest to becoming clowns. As for the court case, before the judge laughs in these jokers faces, Google's defense may easily be as follows:
a. The obvious point of, "you never asked to have it removed."
b. Find clausable reason that the plantiff is trying to turn this fiasco into a publicity stunt in an effort to increase the property value, not devalue it, as they claim. Furthermore, Google paid resources to have their property imaged (van, tires, oil, gas, human resources), and should be exempt for providing a public service for FREE.
I truly beleive that if Google proactively removed/morphed the view of their property, they would have wanted to sue Google for the same exact shit; "We demand in excess of $25,000 to make up for the 'mental suffering' and the diminished value of our home for omitting it from StreetView ."
Stupidity like this goes on and on everyday.
a. The obvious point of, "you never asked to have it removed."
b. Find clausable reason that the plantiff is trying to turn this fiasco into a publicity stunt in an effort to increase the property value, not devalue it, as they claim. Furthermore, Google paid resources to have their property imaged (van, tires, oil, gas, human resources), and should be exempt for providing a public service for FREE.
I truly beleive that if Google proactively removed/morphed the view of their property, they would have wanted to sue Google for the same exact shit; "We demand in excess of $25,000 to make up for the 'mental suffering' and the diminished value of our home for omitting it from StreetView
Stupidity like this goes on and on everyday.
