When I read
Atlas Shrugged several years ago, I wasn't [still ain't] familiar with Marx. I've run across this:
In a higher phase of communist society, after the enslaving subordination of the individual to the division of labor, and therewith also the antithesis between mental and physical labor, has vanished; after labor has become not only a means of life but life's prime want; after the productive forces have also increased with the all-around development of the individual, and all the springs of co-operative wealth flow more abundantly -- only then then can the narrow horizon of bourgeois right be crossed in its entirety and society inscribe on its banners: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs! --Karl Marx, 1875 in "Critique of the Gotha Program"
I feel robbed. Erasing the antithesis between mental and physical labor? Labor is life's prime want? Abundant springs of cooperative wealth?
This is the context of the "ability/needs" guilt-trip?
It's like Ayn Rand plagiarized her entire philosophy of the human spirit from this paragraph, then tagged NUH-UH! onto the last sentence.
She needed to set her book apart. She did it not by
philosophy, as she harps about in her nonfiction, but with a demonizing phrase:
at the point of a gun. An accurate description of her Stalinist childhood, maybe, but hardly fair game in a battle of ideas.
A writer's parlor trick is to use the narrative to humanize his protagonist's
motive; a thoughtful unmasking of
Orson Scott Card on this front explains the technique at length. The good guys do to make the world better, the bad guys do for greed, therefore the good guy's action is moral. Even if he exterminated a sentient race, or held the secret to free energy hostage and waited for society to collapse.
Nowhere outside the Old Testament and
Meinkampf do we see that kind of spite justified. An
academic examination of Rand as an intellectual and a moral being becomes a fairly withering criticism.
While we're on the subject of self-important bitches repackaging commie memes, Mona Charen would have me believe her pet phrase "useful idiot" was Lenin's way of referring to American liberals. Since
this week's polls have 2/3 of Americans saying "wrong track" despite a Republican Congress and George Bush White House, I'm getting a little humor out of the irony.
I'm not tied down to conservative polemics as useful idiots, though. You can take your pick of sociopathic lunatics (A. Coulter, M. "Savage" Weiner), or drug-addled hypocrite windbags (R. Limbaugh), or jesters flattering the aristocracy, or greedy rats playing a character to turn Americans against each other. Useful idiots implies they get nothing from the deal and don't know any better, which absolves them of too much responsibility.