Comment Re: Naw, it's Doctors (Score 1) 696
Actual laws vary from state to state, but some states (like California) actually suggest riding closer to the center of the lane when there isn't a separate bicycle lane and the traffic lane isn't wide enough for a car to safely pass. From the California DMV website:
Many roads do not have designated bicycle traffic lanes, so bicyclists share the traffic lane to the left of the white line. If there is no shoulder or bicycle lane and the traffic lane is narrow, ride closer to the center of the lane. This will prevent motorists from passing you when there is not enough room.
There's more extensive details in the formal traffic code as well. Of course this probably varies from state to state (California law also indicates that a car can only pass a bicycle if it can give three feet of room, so "enough room" is at least well-defined); don't assume the same expectations applies elsewhere without checking first.
I do agree that there are a lot of idiots on bikes out there doing really stupid/dangerous things (biking the wrong direction in bike lanes, biking at night without lights, etc.) and a surprising amount of the time it's because they never bothered to learn the part of the traffic code that deals with bicycles. We only let people drive cars and motorcycles on roads if they pass a test and earn a license . . . it seems like we really need similar requirements for anyone operating a bicycle on on public roads as well. It certainly wouldn't eliminate all of the idiots who shouldn't be on a bike (just as DMV tests today don't eliminate all of the idiot drivers), but it would hopefully help.