Comment Re:Now I Have Seen It All (Score 1) 59
What about "Biologically Reversible Exploration"???
"The international Committee on Space Research (COSPAR) has established a "planetary protection" policy that involves not contaminating other worlds in a way that would jeopardize the conduct of future scientific investigations. As a signatory to the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, the United States is required by article IX to avoid "harmful contamination" of the other worlds of the Solar System. However, further revisions to the policy are needed...
The spacecraft that have landed on Mars have all been surface missions. Contaminants will remain local and static and can be removed without requiring an effort vastly larger than the missions that carried the contamination. Even at the crash sites, debris from Earth extends no more than a few meters into the surface. Reversing the contamination involves recovering the spacecraft parts and exposing any contaminated dirt to the sterilizing ultraviolet (UV) sunlight. However, if, for example, robotic or human explorers drill to investigate a subsurface aquifer, biologically reversible exploration would require rigorous sterilization of any components that go down the drill hole. Similarly, if human explorers establish bases inside caves (12), the naturally sterilizing effect of the surface UV would be lost, and contamination would be persistent.
We should not do anything now that would close off options for the future. I propose that COSPAR, in its upcoming discussions, set a policy that all Mars exploration be biologically reversible and that this policy extend to human exploration as well."