Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:Good for them (Score 1) 148

Selling it the black market is only half the part, not getting caught is the important part. More damage a exploit can cause Groupon ( i.e. higher the value on the market) more the chances law enforcement will be knocking on your door.

Companies like Groupon face a higher risk from dissatisfied(or the dumb ones exposed to phishing/social engineering ) employees leaking information than from external exploits, so they are screwed anyway if white hats/employees start acting in bad faith. They are counting on good faith of majority of the players and possibility of punishment via law enforcement to save them.

Comment Re:Good for them (Score 1) 148

No he is saying experts will still participate in programs because it is not too much effort and possibility of a payday will keep them in the program, despite poor track record of these companies.

Obviously you would loose the best experts who will spend the time and have the expertise to find the most obscure vulnerabilities. If those researchers where not interested at all in the program ( too small bounty for the effort, groupon track record etc) then Groupon losses nothing by having stingy payment policies.

Comment Re:Untraceable (Score 1) 152

If tracking cash transactions were as easy as you make them out to be, every illegal laundering from drugs to arms would have been long shut down.

a unique serial number is not personally identifiable by itself. Cash is far more anonymous than bitcoin, yes people can theoretically track it, with bitcoin EVERY transaction is by definition recorded. With cash some transactions maybe recorded, retailers do not necessarily record the serial number of every bill of each transaction, while that is certainly possible it is still not common place. Even if all were tracked in the U.S. there are still plenty of holes in your graph, making it difficult to every get anywhere near full picture, primarily due to the nature of U.S. currency. Plenty of people in the world use $ as their medium of exchange, these people who feds have very little control over and can do little to track either.

Comment Re:Untraceable (Score 1) 152

This is BS, Crypto-currency has very little to do transaction privacy or central control.

if you are worried about privacy of transaction then use cash! .. does a $100 bill hold any "personally identifiable information" barring some trace DNA or fingerprints? central entity controlling has nothing to do with privacy of transactions. cash is controlled by a central entity, yet it is near anonymous. Not being governed by a central entity is a stupid reason for alternative currency.

If you want use anything that has no value on its own as money be it paper (cash), plastic, or Hashes as a store of value, then you will have to trust someone to enforce it. Otherwise you are going to have volatility, and people losing money in scams just look at the ones happening in bitcoin.

Slashdot Top Deals

"We shall reach greater and greater platitudes of achievement." -- Richard J. Daley