Comment Re:Surprised? (Score 2, Informative) 651
The law itself was not really found to violate the 'free speech' right.
In a previous ruling the Supreme Court of Canada (I think) upheld said law.
This ruling found "the law was originally intended to be âoeremedial, preventative and conciliatory in nature,â rather than a means to hand out penalties."
It was really the punishment called for by the law that was found to be inequitable. Because of this problem no action will be taken though the defendant was found to be guilty of 'hate speech'.