Comment Re:good, but (Score 1) 118
Good, since UNESCO is captured by dictatorial anti-US regimes.
But why is this in
Well, now it will at least be free of authoritarian US regimes.
Also wondering why this is
Good, since UNESCO is captured by dictatorial anti-US regimes.
But why is this in
Well, now it will at least be free of authoritarian US regimes.
Also wondering why this is
Smart phones has helped users with being firmiliar with getting all apps via one location, which is the strength of Linux on the desktop
Although this is no longer the case for many distros. You have debs, rpms, snaps and flatpaks and they come from many different sources, some with dubious traceability to source.
The "snaps" are not the problem. Its the crypto shit.
Just ban the fucking things from the app stores. If people want it, they can download it from github,
I disagree. The "snaps" are the problem, because unlike the apt-get flow, "snaps" are uncurated. They also auto update by default, and in fact it's very hard not to have them auto update. This means a vendor can easily push malicious content at a later time without most users (and canonical) noticing, even so called "power users". Even Apple lets users control if and when to update. "snaps" as they are implemented now are not an acceptable distribution solution IMO.
vsync? that's what it does, syncs the image redraw to the screen refresh...
Yes, but rarely do programs succeed in using it correctly and frame skipping is common. Vsync on a 60 Hz display requires the material to be an exact multiple of 60 Hz if skipping is to be avoided. On older computers this was the norm!
Hold on to the root.