Comment BIIIIIIG MISTAKE (Score 1) 163
We can't do the things "just because" we can.
All these almighty tools that use stolen information from experts around the world, must be directed to resolve the unknown, not to replace the stablished solutions, destroying in their path the life of people that have been improving their craft on a lifetime work. And here is the big question
Anyway, when a "current" AI solution is created, we know nothing about it. We have no idea how it works inside and how could evolve in the future. There is no easy method to tune it in very particular directions, neither or to transform it to be perfectly adapted to the daily nuances of life. The usual methodology here is to replace it with a new solution, but following this direction we have no idea if the already resolved characteristics will work the same with the new version. Humanity behavior is not so easy to track.
The answer is not to replace but to complement. It is not to need less engineers, but to help them to work better products, to advance faster but improving the life of more people. When what we think is only about how our product can do what others already do, we destroy their lifes and trash the marvels that this new technology could be working on instead.
And all this look as a huge applied EGO, making the result even more bizarre. Really, why do we need to follow this path?