Comment US numbers are good too (Score 2) 144
Here's the US solar growth numbers from the same report: https://ember-energy.org/lates...
Here's the US solar growth numbers from the same report: https://ember-energy.org/lates...
Ok so what should Trump do next then to excercise US Military power if not a ground war? Send Musk's robots to go in and destroy all their nuclear secrets? Even better question, why do you think Trump would sit and look like an idiot getting trounced rather than use these measures immediately?
The US has barely touched civilian infrastructure because that isn't the goal. They could destroy the place if they wanted to.
Yet somehow they've demonstrated the limits of US power. Donald Trump is now stuck between a rock and a hard place.
The US has used a tiny fraction of its power in Iran. They could bomb the place into rubble if they wanted to, but that isn't the goal. The goals are: No nuclear weapons, stop funding terrorists all over the world, stop threatening their neighbors and international shipping. Iran has a well educated population and natural resources that would make them a very prosperous country but they are ruled by thugs.
James Bond died in the last one, so maybe this is his dead corpse getting resurrected or something
Outside of banning the technology there isn't really a hell of a lot you can do. We are not going to build the capacity because that would require tax dollars from extremely wealthy people and those people run the country so no they're not going to pay for you to have electricity.
Our entire civilization is being slowly dismantled. But how about those trans girls in sports am I right?
This is a completely retarded take. 25 GW of generating capacity were added in 2025, and 86 GW will be added in 2026. https://www.eia.gov/todayinene... But the data centers and other demands are growing fast too: https://www.eia.gov/todayinene...
Our civilization is doing just fine, and female sports divisions are for females only. Males can always compete in male sports divisions or coed sports.
Every year the project cost increases by billions while little gets done. Next year it will jump again.
In my area all the high-performing kids are going to Kuman and getting more homework to do. All the kids in honors classes are getting more homework to do.
Getting rid of homework is not the ticket to success.
Is it though? Given how offshore wind with fixed platforms can be competitive with gas turbines without subsides, and given how wind is being built without subsidies elsewhere I think that this can be the usual case of "according to the administration" just meaning once again - we're lying through our teeth to justify supreme orange man's ideology.
Even then the approach is stupid. Some of these projects are very early on. Just remove the subsidies and they'll fail their FID and cancel themselves. The fact that you need to pay them out to the tune of the dollars mentioned shows that any pretext of them not being viable is just bullshit.
My understanding is offshore wind is only viable with taxpayer subsidies and guaranteed high electric rates. Do you have examples where offshore wind produces cheap energy?
yes you earned it, you saved it and now you are dead. you inheritors did neither of those things, why do they get a 0% tax on fresh income?
or as a founding father himself put it about estate taxes on the very wealthiest "The object is not so much the produce of the tax as the justice of the measure. The aristocracy has screened itself too much, and this serves to restore a part of the lost equilibrium."
I bet he didn't consider himself or any of the other founding fathers to be part of that aristocracy, and that he further never intended it to mean HIS family would not inherit the fruits of his labors.
That may be your attitude, but if you refuse to pay taxes you owe under the law, they absolutely will have it (either the easy way or the hard way). But what you think is rather irrelevant for estate tax. You'll be dead when it comes time to pay. The executor of your estate is unlikely to refuse to take care of its tax obligations, especially if it's worth $28 million because they would be putting themselves on the line for something that would likely provide them no economic benefit.
I'm always a bit puzzled by people's vehement opposition to the estate tax. I'm a long way from $28 million, but I am at the point where it's plausible I could get there before I die. I don't think my kids would benefit from that level of payday. Passing a million or two on to a kid that may not have a high-paying career could be life changing, but why do my kids need mansion and yacht money? Likewise, my parents are also in the net worth category where it's plausible their estate could get hit with estate tax someday. If so, it doesn't really bother me. I didn't earn that money.
Of course the thresholds are lower in some states, but the rates tend to be much lower than federal estate taxes. It's likely more of an administrative hassle for executors than a truly meaningful hit to the inheritance.
Look, I saved the money by being frugal. My car is 27 years old and I haven't been on vacation in years. My only debt is my mortgage. Sending the message that if you don't spend everything the government wants it is just the wrong message. We want people to save money and be able to provide for themselves and their families.
Let them flee. The rich do not provide any benefits. The rich do not pay their fair share of anything. The rich do not help the economy. The rich do not earn money, they take money.
How many poor people have you worked for?
You neither own a business nor make $400k a year
So I should vote for my free new cars, right?
Public fundraising reports are quite misleading post- Citizens United because most of a campaign's resources come from PACs and 501(c)(4) organizations that do not have to report their fundraising as candidate fundraising. At the end of the day, it doesn't really matter much if the campaign or an affiliated organization runs ads on the candidate's behalf.
That report covered outside money, and Open Secrets is no right wing source.
But even assuming some is missing Kamala had plenty of cash and non-cash support from all sides.
As for the estate tax, I earned it and saved it so I could take care of myself and my family. If I die with something left it's for my kids. It's not yours to take. Estate taxes and wealth taxes incentivize spending instead of saving and investing.
If your estate is less than 28 million dollars, you're not taxed. Even in 2001, a home would have to be worth 2 million in today's dollars to be taxed. Even then, ONLY THE AMOUNT OVER WOULD BE TAXED. So if you have a $28,000,100 home, you'd only pay the tax on the $100.01 over the limit.
You either didn't think this out or are a horrible person...I will wager you didn't understand the law. It has only applied to the ultra-wealthy. If you have 28 million dollars in property and think you actually earned it without the help of the gov and the rest of the country and don't want to invest in roads and public schools and police to protect your assets....go fuck yourself. Every wealthy person got wealthy off the shoulders of those before them with the assistance of the gov and an army of publicly schooled employees building their wealth....publicly financed roads, energy infrastructure, defense, etc.
In a modern oligarchy, the wealthy mooch off the people, absorbing subsidies, like Musk does...while the rest of us watch our costs go up, service go down, and Republicans offering bullshit ICE and culture war theater....yeah, my grocery bills have nearly doubled since 2016 because I enjoy meat and eggs...but hey, Trump owned the libs, right?...that's worth me having a lower standard of living than my parents at my age, despite the fact that I literally earn 4x as much as they did combined AND have one less kid!!!!
You think there is only one law. The threshold is $1 million in some states.
Regardless it is theft. I earned it, I saved it, and you can't have it. Go fuck yourself
Billionaires shouldn't exist, they're a runaway condition in our economic system that should be corrected.
The tax should be ongoing, and slightly higher than inflation, scaling with distance from an agreed-upon 'reasonable wealth'.
Under this system almost every major tech company wouldn't have been created in the USA
All science is either physics or stamp collecting. -- Ernest Rutherford