Re:Irrelevant - it's a contract suit, not trademar (Score 1)

Actually, the clause is the agreement went something like "can't make music" and I don't believe the iPod or the ITMS do this. In reality the Mac is more of a breach of this clause than either the iPod or the ITMS - at least you can MAKE music on a Mac. From another angle Apple (Computer) can of course argue that they are not infringing on Apple Corp.'s market because they are not selling any competing products and if Apple Corp. wanted to introduce these products themselves they should have done so by now. Companies that sit on trademarks then sue other's that make something of them really piss me off.