Comment Re:I'll take over (Score 1) 174
> decisions are generally a lot less arbitrary than people imagine. It's just
> that when someone gets suspended they tend to only post misleading
> reports about it
Strong disagree. Twitter's rules don't accomplish what Twitter says they accomplish, and the enforcement is uneven, arbitrary, unreasonable, and utterly opaque to users. I've seen countless examples of utterly arbitrary enforcement, and regularly repeated claims that perfectly normal content is somehow a violation. Not only in my case, but in many, many cases.
In this case, a woman was gleefully discussion the fact that human face mites do, in fact, have anuses, and therefore our faces are covered in face mite poo. The conversation was already about this topic - merely suggesting that we affix tiny diapers to them so we can study the poo is not hostile in anyway. This person didn't understand or like the suggestion and instead of muting the tweet or the tweet author, they used Twitter's rules and the company's pro-complainant bias to remove my ability to use the service. That's neither just nor reasonable nor sensible.
I'd suggest examining your instinct to defend the giant faceless corporation over real people, but figure that'd be a waste.
