Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Not suspicious at all (Score 1) 62

the same reason as always .. power. Someone on the board had the power to remove him and they were beneficiaries in one way or another. We'll probably never know because Machiavellian schemers play thier cards close to thier chest. One thing is certain, there will be an insane dash in the coming decade to monopolise the AI service sector the race will be dirty, bloody and ruthless.

Comment Utter garbage and peak hypocrisy (Score -1) 152

Owen Jones is 100% for banning and cancelling anyone or any opinions he considers right wing or dangerous yet he also is that special double think manner considers banning anonymity dangerous. Ignore this millionaire socialist journalist who is an expert in everthing and whose 'opinion' matters. He is a repeater and ampilfier of corporate and cathedral propaganda at best,

Comment Re:NSO have some explaining to do (Score 1) 50

The software isn't expensive to replicate .. after all the cost is in the R & D and the expertise of the development team .. actually reproducing it or reverse engineering the code using debugging tools really isn't expensive at all. NSA couldn't keep the lid on it's toolkit what makes you think a private company can do better ? Where there is greed or the opportunity to subvert/coerse members of the development team of those with access comes weakness in security. Deploying the toolkits onto target devices really isn't that hard either, scripting deployment on a mass scale really isn't that hard technologically.

Slashdot Top Deals

Nothing is finished until the paperwork is done.

Working...