| Subject | Datestamp | Replies | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Re:Is "Open Source" a registered trademark? | ||||||
| attached to OSI To Crack Down On "Open Source" Abusers | ||||||
| We need a Mutual Defense | ||||||
| attached to SBC Patents Links, Dynamic Pages | ||||||
| Defend Open Source Against SCO | ||||||
| attached to SCO Group Hires Boies After All | ||||||
| Re:licensed reverse engineering? | ||||||
| Re:Who's this "we"? | ||||||
| Re:Who's this "we"? | ||||||
| Re:My question | ||||||
| Re:Larry Rosen... | ||||||
| Re:My question | ||||||
| Re:licensed reverse engineering? | ||||||
| Re:Who's this "we"? | ||||||
| attached to Larry Rosen on the Microsoft Penalty Ruling | ||||||
| Re:APIs and Middleware | ||||||
| attached to Ask a Legal Expert How MS Ruling Affects Open Source | ||||||
| Re:Where's the license? | ||||||
| Re:Where's the license? | ||||||
| What the GPL requires is not relevant | ||||||
| Re:Restatement of the Click-Wrap Issue | ||||||
| Re:I'm suspicious of this... | ||||||
| Re:Restatement of the Click-Wrap Issue | ||||||
| Restatement of the Click-Wrap Issue | ||||||
| attached to Click-Thru Licensing on Open Source Software? | ||||||
A bug in the code is worth two in the documentation.