Comment Re:More complaining and second-guessing (Score 1) 77
"Published negative studies dissuade doctors from using certain offlabel treatments. Published negative studies prevent other docs from wasting time and money to discover the same results."
This is my gut reaction to reading TFA. I understand that in a sense, this isn't new news. Some of the commenters have talked about the time and cost associated with organizing and publishing negative/unintended results. However, from a scientific point of view, this seems like the single most important reason to publish that data; to allow other scientists to both learn from other's mistakes and improve on said mistakes if possible.
This is my gut reaction to reading TFA. I understand that in a sense, this isn't new news. Some of the commenters have talked about the time and cost associated with organizing and publishing negative/unintended results. However, from a scientific point of view, this seems like the single most important reason to publish that data; to allow other scientists to both learn from other's mistakes and improve on said mistakes if possible.