^Best answer yet! âoeThey are a private company, they can do what they want âoe

Itâ(TM)s ridiculous whatever they call it. Itâ(TM)s like letting the SS run the Nuremberg trials.

They don't get a pass because they couldn't get inside. They just get to be known as failures in addition to being insurrectionists. So the BLM riots were not mostly peaceful then? If you were there and looting and rioting happened, you are also to blame? OK, I agree.

Even the FBI retracted the capture and assassinate rhetoric.

âoeAnd if we've got people walking around ready to commit murder based solely on "I saw his picture on a website", I find it hard to blame the picture or the website. Even if it were to repeatedly whisper "Kill..." each time you opened it.â So then using social media to incite violence shouldnâ(TM)t be blamed on the platform. Like Parler, for instance.

Whataboutism. The argument used when you have no defense of the actions cited.

How about a guillotine? https://www.newsweek.com/prote...