Comment Re:But is ANIMATED child porn really child porn? (Score 1) 264
I seem to recall that some production of the film "Lolita" cast in Lolita's role an actress who was over 18 but looked younger (perhaps much younger, I haven't seen it so I don't know).
Actually, I know that the actor in the most recent Lolita was 15, and I believe the one in Stanley Kubricks original version was underage too...
In both of these movies sex was depicted, and this was perfectly legal, because they weren't actually having sex. (There are alot of movies like this: Brooke Shields was 15 in the Blue Lagoon , a very explicit film)
The laws of child porn say that you can't show anybody under 18 doing sexually explicit things for real I assume, thats all.
Actually, I know that the actor in the most recent Lolita was 15, and I believe the one in Stanley Kubricks original version was underage too...
In both of these movies sex was depicted, and this was perfectly legal, because they weren't actually having sex. (There are alot of movies like this: Brooke Shields was 15 in the Blue Lagoon , a very explicit film)
The laws of child porn say that you can't show anybody under 18 doing sexually explicit things for real I assume, thats all.
