Comment Derivative Work from a Book in the Public Domain (Score 1) 1073
I am perfectly fine with NewSouth Books changing words in Huckleberry Finn. Huckleberry Finn is in the public domain and therefore all are free to create derivative works from it. Once they change the words in the book, however, the work they create is no longer Huckleberry Finn. It is a derivative work of fiction based on Huckleberry Finn; it should be required to be marked and marketed as such. It is not the original book, and it's title should ambiguously confirm this fact, such that the buyer is not confused. It is in their self interest to do so; if buyers are confused as to if they are buying the original book, Huckleberry Finn, or the derivative work, they may mistakenly purchase the book they did not intend to purchase. This could cause lost sales for NewSouth Books. Given this clear information the market will determine if the original or derivative work is more popular. (One would hope the original work wins out in the market of course, for the betterment of society). If they intend to deceive the buyer by calming that the book they publish is actually Huckleberry Finn, then they should be admonished and prevented from doing so, as such actions are harmful to society.