And if you ask most serious economists they'll tell you the same thing: while there might be some short-term hiccups when a whole bunch of immigrants show up at once, in the long run, throughout history, immigration is good for countries.
No... immigration is good for the *economy*.... just by the definition that it increases demand for goods and services and thus overall GDP. This, however, does not mean that it's good for the country or that an economy depending on growth is sustainable or healthy.
The series comes from the 'Current Population Survey (Household Survey)'
Thing is, I hate when people use household data for salary info... that's totally bunk, it should be per-earner with a SINGLE job for it to be valid. Household income is more of a measure of overall economic freedom of the population.
Accounts from some of those conversations paint a disturbing picture, suggesting that many AI safety workers inside cutting-edge labs are concerned about perverse incentives driving decisionmaking by the executives who control their companies.
This right here is the right worry... for far too long, extremely intelligent people have handed over powerful means to moronic trust fund babies. The managers of public companies are not in a position to ethically or responsibly use this technology anymore. Just look at the history of how companies defended the use of toxic materials, cancer causing chemicals, lead in gas, all kinds of things. I trust AI will be fine, I don't trust the sleezeballs in charge of so many companies out there.
One has to look out for engineers -- they begin with sewing machines and end up with the atomic bomb. -- Marcel Pagnol