like

LOL - who is /. going to pick in this fight - they hate them both but have to pick a side.

Helen: Everyone's special, Dash.
Dash: [muttering] Which is another way of saying no one is.
or
Syndrome: *Everyone* can be super! And when everyone's super... [laughs maniacally] ...*no one* will be.

Yeah...good luck with that...

funniest thing I've read on slashdot, and I've read a lot of funny things here

I think it's fun.

February 2016 - 4.9% February 2017 - 4.7% The .2% reduction most likely comes from March 2016 - February 2017 job growth as part of a downward trend in unemployment rates.

The post was a little emotional, but the data is valid. February 2017 numbers are in-line (and slightly lower) than February 2016 and February 2015 numbers. It's part of a trend with some ups and downs and probably can't be attributed to the current administration. It's not a partisan issue, it's just data points. Trump can take credit for it, but it's probably no more deserved than the first months of Obama's first administration which would have been the result of Bush policies - or the first few months of George W's administration which would have been the result of Clinton policies. It's too bad these conversations devolve so quickly.

Angry much?

...written for Kim Jung Un....that's some funny stuff right d'ere!

How is that being a fanboi - it's an excellent analogy.

You are a horrible person. Nothing funny about this.

That was a quote from the article - wasn't it? He didn't insert it - he quoted the first paragraph from the article.

They didn't miss their earnings and profit targets, they were in line with the guidance they gave on this quarter from 3 months ago. They had a decline, but they didn't mislead anyone - they predicted the decline in the quarter.

Spat - a petty quarrel. This legal battle may set precedent that determines the course of security for the foreseeable future. It is hardly a "spat".