For those outside the US that want to get their hands one one of these things, sorry: Honda tells us it's only planned for the US market. Consider it the Japanese motor maker's attempt to spare you all the pain of having your shins smashed in public spaces by passing waves of motorized carry-ons.
One thing I wonder about for the somewhat distant future though is, how will we ever move to a new connector if someone in the industry develops a better connector? Since the move to USB-C was in large part pushed by the EU, what is the process (if any) of proposing technological upgrades to government mandated standards?
I read this text:
Regular updates: the Commission will be empowered to adopt delegated acts amending the list and the technical specifications in light of scientific and technological progress or market developments, to improve consumer convenience, avoid market fragmentation and reduce environmental waste. It will also be required to continuously assess whether adding other devices to this list would significantly improve consumer convenience and reduce environmental waste. The first report on this assessment is due by the end of 2025, and every five years afterwards (Article 3).
on https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/698819/EPRS_BRI(2021)698819_EN.pdf as at least an indication that they're thinking about possible future technological upgrades.
"A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in human history-with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila." -- Mitch Ratcliffe
The Dutch have a few centuries of experience with managing water, why automate with the potential of something going wrong?
Quite a lot of people seem to like watching a few minutes each, displaying some attention to nature, and it's engagement of the public from the view of the water authorities and the municipality of Utrecht.
For Linux systems USBGuard can be probably be used to block devices like this. Anybody aware about similar software functionality for other OSes?
How to use Linux's built-in USB attack protection
https://www.zdnet.com/article/how-to-use-linuxs-built-in-usb-attack-protection/
It appears to me that Debian Stable is unpatched after public disclosure, two weeks after the kernel update and one week after private disclosure to the distros. For a two line patch that's obvious on its face. I hope I can't read
If you missed the next line just below vulnerable on https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-0847 then yes, read a bit more carefully next time, please.
Back to the linked article, the suspected/suggested cause is more in the direction of manufacturing defects.
DRAM chip reliability is ~5.5x worse in DDR4 compared to DDR3.
from: https://www.amd.com/system/files/documents/advanced-memory-device-correction.pdf
I'm missing the examples for those modern operating systems without "Files" and "Folders"...
2019 linux.conf.au presentation on "Database as Filesystem" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wN6IwNriwHc shows some reasons why filesytems are not so bad after all, among those:
for general read/write ops.
Nothing succeeds like excess. -- Oscar Wilde