It's no wonder Windows crashes 3x more often, because there are 3x more PCs installed. Apple has always had a mich smaller market share.

Yeah, but MacOS sucks big donkey dicks. It's a joke of an OS. Their UX is awful. Finder is an abomination. Glass is ass. So I really don't care how fast a single core runs on their new cheap-o laptop, it's still only going to run MacOS, which sucks.

Nothing you wrote matters. It's an Apple II, security was not a thing when they built this system.

It's funny that you think "script kiddie" is still a relevant thing in tech, but this is slashdot I guess.

No amount of fixing bugs in any software, especially the one described in the article, is going to prevent any of that on an Apple II.

I just found their description of it as a "security issue" to be rather amusing.

>I am always confused why people don't understand proof of concepts.

I'm not sure what about my comment made you think I don't understand "proof of concepts".

My comment was strictly about the phrasing "security issues" within a system that has no login prompt, and no concept of security to begin with. It's an absolute trash way to present the findings, framing it as "security issues". It's nonsense. The Apple II never had any security to begin with, none at all, zero...

"It decompiled the machine language and found several security issues"

Security issues on an Apple II? It's difficult to imagine what kind of "security" they think is possible on an Apple II.

You've huffed too many of AI's farts. You actually think an LLM "knows" about reality? You. Are Cooked.

Nobody should believe trump without overwhelming proof, because trump has provably lied more than any other president, and by a lot. But I would guess you would believe anything he says, because your mind has been so deranged by your orange god-king constantly lying to you, that now you fart out "tDs" any chance you get as an assurance to yourself that you are not the one who is deranged, it must be everyone else who doesn't believe your god-king's lies.

DMT is naturally produced in your brain. Even though you might think a lot of people are "insane", DMT does not cause "insanity".

Ayahuasca is DMT, it's a drink that combines DMT containing elements with other elements that allow the DMT to be metabolized in the stomach instead of being destroyed upon ingestion. DMT can also be inhaled by itself, or injected as in the case of this story. DMT is also naturally produced inside your brain.

DMT is also naturally produced in your brain.

> Altman called the commercials "deceptive" and "clearly dishonest."

So pretty much like the output from his own ChatGPT.

> And Google's version at the time didn't have anywhere NEAR this privacy-raping capability.

I happen to know one of the main developers of Google's facial recognition systems, and way back in the day probably 20 years ago, before "Google Glass" was a thing, someone had the idea of being able to identify random people out in public using Google's tech. The developers shut down that idea quickly. That was just too much for them. Facebook is vastly different than Google was back in the day, so it comes as no surprise that Facebook would be the ones pushing this tech. I'm just surprised they didn't get to it sooner.

All this work they're doing so we can get lied to constantly by a machine.