This EO is also attempting to prevent states from regulating how AI is used inside the state. If some political hack wants to use AI to determine who can and cannot have access to some state funded service, then the government of that state won't be able to regulate it. It should be easy to see that this is not a good thing.

Nothing about "AI" makes financial sense. These companies are losing many billions of dollars, so why not shoot an "AI" datacenter into space? It won't make a significant difference in the tally of money lost to "AI". And all of this for the love of "AI" slop.

>No wonder he left her...

Victim blaming is not a good look. Nevermind, that's probably your only look.

Pics (link) or it didn't happen.

Youtube forcing shorts on me made me move to SmatTube app on my chromecast. Now I see no more shorts at all in the UI, completely gone. There are many other great features of SmartTube that make it worth switching to.

You could switch to Linux, and run Windows in a virtual machine.

If countries like russia can implement a "firewall" blocking their citizens from accessing the rest of the world, surely the rest of the world could block Russia? I guess they would work around that somehow, but fuck russia, they bring nothing of value to the world, only grief and lies.

"AI" coding is a waste of time and effort. I've tried all the "AI"s, and they are all similarly bad at coding, delivering bad result after bad result. The few times it gets it right have been slower than I could have written the code myself. It isn't saving anyone any time except for maybe people with zero coding ability using vibe coding tools. If pro coders really looked at all the hassle that goes along with "AI" coding tools, they aren't really saving any time if they were any good to begin with. And if they aren't any good then they won't realize the mistakes "AI" is making and they will introduce those bugs into the codebase. Zuckerberk is just trying to justify all the money they've spent on "AI" by making his employees use it.

>Trump is corrupt, but at least he's coherent.

Baaahahahahhahalaoallaololololohaahahahhaha You have lost your goddamned mind.

And you think Trump is somehow more fit to be president? You've just told us all how stupid you are.

I take issue with the "improve accuracy" claim, with the exception of improving grammar. Many people lack the ability to write grammatically correct sentences, so it does help there, but so does a simple spell checker and tools we've already had forever. Though the text "AI" produces is technically correct, it always sounds like a bot wrote it. There's just something hollow about it.

>But like any tool, they need to be used with transparency and critical thinking

Well then we're fucked from the start. The problem is people don't use critical thinking anymore, which is why people submit "AI" generated court cases that don't exist, and then they end up in trouble. "Support decision making"? LMFAO

This is yet another stupidest thing I've ever heard from the AI crowd. So they can deliver "6 Gigawatts" worth of "AI" chips, great. So just make the most inefficient chips possible, and deliver less of them. Profit!

Do you like being lied to? Just use an AI. Do you like putting your job at risk by delivering lies to your clients? Just use an AI.

You mean the Democrats that were hamstrung by an obstructionist GOP congress? Those Democrats?

You are attempting a bad-faith argument.

Congress should do most things he's signing executive orders for... why not this? Congress simply doesn't matter anymore with a dictator in charge.