I take issue with the "improve accuracy" claim, with the exception of improving grammar. Many people lack the ability to write grammatically correct sentences, so it does help there, but so does a simple spell checker and tools we've already had forever. Though the text "AI" produces is technically correct, it always sounds like a bot wrote it. There's just something hollow about it.
>But like any tool, they need to be used with transparency and critical thinking
Well then we're fucked from the start. The problem is people don't use critical thinking anymore, which is why people submit "AI" generated court cases that don't exist, and then they end up in trouble. "Support decision making"? LMFAO