Federal Deadline Hobbling eHealth IT Rollout 99
Secret Service Runs At "Six Sixes" Availability 248
NHS Should Stop Funding Homeopathy, Says Parliamentary Committee 507
Sony Joins the Offensive Against Pre-Owned Games 461
Why Time Flies By As You Get Older 252
Own Your Own Fighter Jet 222
Tower Switch-Off Embarrasses Electrosensitives 292
Augmented Reality To Help Mechanics Fix Vehicles 81
Air Canada Ordered To Provide Nut-Free Zone 643
Whatever Happened To Second Life? 209
Best Man Rigs Newlyweds' Bed To Tweet During Sex 272
Aussie Scientists Find Coconut-Carrying Octopus 205
Comment Universities with parental workload relief (Score 1) 616
Comment Mandatory competition (Score 1) 647
The article fails to mention that in both Korea and Japan, the government played a major role: In Japan, by forcing the incumbent to allow multiple IP operators to use the fiber at very low rates and in Korea, by construction subsidies. This isn't really technology competition as the article calls for - all the countries with cheap broadband use fiber-to-the-home or fiber-to-the-apartment-complex, with CATV playing a relatively small role. (There's very limited WiBro, the local version of WiMax, deployment in Korea, which plays almost no role.) And, as far as I know, all those countries have deployed such cheaper and more advanced infrastructure without violating network neutrality.
The argument about population density might explain the absence of DSL and fiber in Montana, but doesn't exactly explain the high cost of FiOS in New Jersey (or its limited availability). The population density of New Jersey is very similar to that of Korea, at around 400-500 people/sq km.