I decided to look as ugly as possible, to grow my hair out and have an ugly skullet. Pretty much as a social experiment.

It absolutely is way easier getting laid now than ever.

Though they might confuse you not caring about being ugly, with having confidence.

Also, getting stronger compliments now about looks than ever by strange women, despite that.

And pretty much every guy I've seen that've done that, I see is being chased by women. (I bet most are totally repulsed though.) It sounds like a joke. It is pretty absurd how women think. It is really funny.

I bet a certain percentage of women find Buddha, Chewbacca or wooden-legged midgets attractive as well though.

It (DHT) actually affects fertility in men, though not always.

I thought that was well-known and established.

Maybe you're joking though.

The hormone DHT definitely has a lot to do with the reproductive system and male secondary sexual characteristics.

Eunuchs were known to have great hair and longer life spans.

Some that are intersex, that have XY-chromosomes but look like women instead of men, have DHT-insensitivity.

So, basically, without responding to that hormone, nobody would see any difference between you and a chick.

The effects aren't always linear though and the effects are expressed differently during different life stages, such as in the womb, or during puberty and bla bla bla.

It claimed clearly that Charlie Kirk hadn't been killed, and was alive, after the shooting.

Like Onyx Boox tablets

The people here in this comment section, not worried a bit, is a pretty good demonstration that the US and western world has fallen behind and won't catch up. Made in China, was an insult a couple of decades ago. Now American and European cars are shit in comparison. We can't manufacture chips either.

Yes, democracy and free speech is woke. Long live autocracy.

It is clear that this article could and is putting the President's leadership into question by several readers, and thereby promoting wokeness. This content should be reported to the White House, and this site must start ensuring aligned views with the President and the White House, and could otherwise be seen as attempting to destabilize society.

If you optimize for correctness, and reward being wrong equally as much as admitting lack of knowledge - Then the best thing to do is to guess.

If you have a multiple choice question, and you don't know the answer, you will on average have a higher score if you guess rather than if you leave out answering.

If you're a student taking a test, and you don't know the answer, you will try to write whatever you could come up with, that you find is most likely, rather than abstaining from answering. That makes sense if you want to optimize a score on the test.

That is the same thing.

What should be done, and what is being done now, is something like this: -1 points for be wrong, 0 for not knowing, 1 for a correct answer.

The standard Slashdot way of claiming that LLMs are useless because they aren't deterministic doesn't make sense. Then you could skip modelling anything at all, anywhere.

And basically, another way of getting around it is, that you could just have two different models answering the same thing, or have one model review the answer of another one to get around it.

That's how slashdotters have viewed LLMs. Since it's non-deterministic it has been regarded as advanced auto-complete. It's also a conflict of interest since it would mean that it increases the abstraction enough for their knowledge to become less demanded.

[quote]A little bit, but the best sports are those where everything in the body moves. So try sex (with an athletic partner) instead.[/quote] It ought to be with someone very unathletic so that you'd have to do all the work though.

Batteries get degraded way quicker when charging the vehicle above 80-85%. Selfish isn't the right word. It's straight up dumb. Car loses value and function, likely for nothing. It's not a gas tank. So, it's definitely not just about hogging chargers. It should be more about ruining the cars for nothing.

Just making it less resource intensive, faster and cheaper to use, will allow way more applications. Hallucinations will be hugely reduced in practice, agents will be less lazy, it will be possible to make it less error prone, because you can have more layers of control and follow-up, and are able to make agents learn from experiences, simply because you're able to provide documentation as it experiences things, improving instructions for them. It will also make it more feasible to create layers for testing out agents and instructions continuously before deploying them. Just in that regard, claiming that it is at its peak doesn't make sense. That's basically ignoring most of what it can be used for.

Yea, I thought this was kind of standard procedure. Since they get lazy, leave stuff unfinished, get facts wrong and hallucinate. You can just get rid of most that by having an AI agent handling another bot, of course. I made one this week that are writing plays with some known manuscript writing methods, you can of connect them to bash shells to make personal assistant - with assignments in e.g. MOTD or that get handle by running commands, and then you can kind of build an AI company with hierarchies, which people already have done of course.

Yes, it is nuts that they use gpt-3.5-turbo and why this paper gets any attention here. Slashdot sucks.

Yea, this seems extremely relevant. Really strange that they weren't clearer.