Comment Encrypt Word By Word (Score 1) 266
It's not possible to search for a keyword within a larger encrypted text without decrypting the text. So there have been numerous proposals for indexing methods with various pros and cons.
Suppose we encrypt each word separately? "Beethoven" becomes "mxP370e8" If I want to search for "Beethoven" without letting Google know (put aside, for the moment, the objection that Google _already_ knows everything) I search for "mxP370e8" instead of "Beethoven", and my search returns a link to a word that is surrounded by other encrypted words, perhaps a file. It may be secure enough to let Google know that "mxP370e8" is the third word of a file of 18132 words, and that I searched for it.
Encrypting word-by-word is vulnerable to statistical and traffic analysis, but there are ways to mitigate this, such as by using lots of salt to make all words the same size, changing keys for different files or parts of files (now there is more than one encryption that maps to "Beethoven") and so on.
I think my basic point is that if you want to do what we normally think of as a full-text search, then each searchable word has to be standalone encrypted all by itself, if the third party is going to do the searching.