how many posters - on both 'sides' of this so-called 'debate', who are lending vociferous insights about The Scientific Method and climate 'science', and denigrating the intelligence of certain folks, interestingly many coming from Anonymous Cowards - actually have PhDs in organic chemistry, atmospheric chemistry or physics, or even physical geography...
apart from I Kan Read's link (and i admit I may have missed something), I don't recall seeing one piece of 'support' from a peer-reviewed science journal... whereas the original article derives rom a source which cites folks with such degrees, most of the comments echo 'arguments' heard from one form of propaganda or another (take your pick)... which clearly demonstrates propaganda works