Oh, my ++ is really rusty on the conversion details to which this boils down to, but naturally this is an irresistible challenge, Fnord:
36 False Fnord
14 7 Fnord
Can't remember off the top of my head, but I'd imagine since we have a bool type, it'd render itself something sane such as "False" as a string, and stream:: would have the decency to prefer the string presentation to numeric; I could be miserably wrong and it could as well be either 0 or NULL (well, hopefully not that). Fnord.
I take it that truish to convention "class Fnord" would override the bool Fnord() in scope and create a Fnord by name Fnord. Fnord.
Then again, my eyes have to have been contaminated from some coding style guide, since they hurt from just looking at all those violations. Fnord.
Yes, I've completed my work at current customer and just biding my time. Fnord.
Now please tell me why I tend to land on non-programming jobs? Fnord.
This post contains no Fnords. Please keep the world safe for children and carefully dispose of any Fnord. Fnord.