Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:Regret? (Score 1) 609

She doesn't regret using personal email. She regrets getting CAUGHT using personal email.

"CAUGHT" is quite the right word because she wasn't hiding it I imagine that over the years she must have emailed many hundreds, if not thousands, of people in an official capacity. All of whom could easily see that her email didn't end in ".gov." I imagine she must have emailed many Republicans, etc? Apparently none of whom said anything. And probably many of her intended recipients forwarded her emails to many thousands of other people. None of whom said anything either.

She wasn't really "caught." An issue that was seemingly common knowledge in government circles went viral on her.

Comment Re:As if SMTP were ever secure... (Score 1) 609

General Petraus just plead guilty to talking documents home and giving his biographer access to it.

Petraeus took classified documents home. That's an entirely different set of laws than we're talking about the Clinton. There have yet to be any allegations that Clinton had classified information on her personal email.

Comment Re:Uh ...wat? (Score 5, Informative) 467

For example, "murder" is someone kills someone else, be it by accident, pre-mediated, etc.

Incorrect, and also a terrible example for the point you're trying to make. Murder is the malicious, unlawful killing of someone. It is certainly *not* appropriate to use "murder" to describe an accident. Manslaughter is killing someone with mitigating legal circumstances. Accidentally kiling someone is usually called involuntary manslaughter.

Comment Update the estimate, honestly. (Score 1) 347

Any initial estimate will go to hell quickly. The important thing is good communication between managers and developers to mitigate the effects of slip and to continually update the estimate.

If the developers know by the 2nd week that they're already behind because difficult things were glossed over initially, then they need to feel comfortable telling the managers rather then pretending that they'll catch back up. And the managers need to understand this type of communication is beneficial and not just get angry about schedule slip, disincentivizing further communication.

Correspondingly a good manager will aggressively probe intermediate milestones.

Manager: "Feature X should be be done now. "

Developer: "Yes."

Manager, "Show me."

Developer: "OK! But we first need to update the front end to reflect the new data model."

Manager: "So Feature X is not done."

Developer, "Well, no."

Comment Re:So which kind of solar is it? (Score 1) 191

Myself, I like people, and I'm very suspicious of people that hate people.

"Hate" is sort of an emotional, melodramatic word, no? I think discussing the relative merits on educating people to self-select fewer children can be discussed without over-the-top, vitriolic terms. There are plenty of rational arguments before resorting to ad hominem. Oddly Greenpeace critics often seem more crazy and emotional the Greenpeace member themselves!

Well, greed would be the only answer.

Whose greed? Who enriches through near-zero population growth? And why is it the "only answer?"

Comment Re:So which kind of solar is it? (Score 1) 191

Doesn't Greenpeace simply oppose all energy generation? They'd rather the earth be devoid of nearly all human existence, save their own worthless butts alone.

No, the Greenpeace model is to move towards distributed, "renewable" generation. E.g. solar/wind at each household or business. Makes some sense in many areas, and can be very efficient. Not a 100% solution, though.

And the Greenpeace model for population is to move towards zero population growth through educations, not to make the earth nearly devoid of human existence.

There's plenty of things to criticize Greenpeace about. You didn't find any of them.

Comment Re:poetry (noun) (Score 1) 187

This is not a poem, it is a collection of words assembled according to the algorithm. It may resemble a poem but it is definitely not an expression of feelings or ideas.

Well you're not operating blind. So your certainty is in doubt. I find it bad. But it has some characteristics that don't seem entirely "random" to me. The word branch near the end seems to allude to the the "snag" of the title. The word "grow" suggests something plant-like, like a bristlecone pine. (though "diamond archiecture" seems totally incongruous).

But the larger uncertainty is its very difficult to backproject art into the "expression of feeling" that generated. Particularly *bad* art. Bad art can be described as a very poor transfer function. The artist may have genuine and deep feeling, but little skill to convey the thoughts.

This would be much more convincing if it was published in a respected poetry journal, not in one that appears to accept any original poem.

Comment Re:Lies, all lies (Score 1) 223

This is an out and out lie. They are just trying to avoid being on the hook for a bankruptcy-sized HIPAA violation.

If you're right, that was a very, very bad lie. Proof of the lie would be extremely damanging to Anthem.

And if you're right, somewhere out there has the proof. Which is now worth a ton of money to the criminal.

Comment Re: If he actually did all that... (Score 1) 257

I'm not sure what point we're trying to make? That all discussions of legal decisions are futile?

Should the Innocence Project shut down because the outcomes are "simply a matter of record."

Should all the lobbyists for leave DC because only the Supreme Court's decision matters?

I don't think anyone's questioning what the legal decision was. We're discussing whether we think the legal system applied justice appropriately. Any society worth anything constantly probes its legal system.

Comment Re:this is why people balk at climate change (Score 2) 481

Show me an airport that doesn't close during hurricanes then you can talk.

Not just closed "during" the hurricane. >20K flights were cancelled over 6 days. Not just because of the hurricane proper but because of major damage from severe storm sruge flooding. I can show you lots of airports that don't get storm surge flooding.

The DOT's assertion is that these events will become more likely. I don't know the validity of the assertion, but that's the assertion.

Can we talk now?

Comment Re:this is why people balk at climate change (Score 3, Informative) 481

30 years and airports will be underwater? I'm willing to believe man has an effect on the climate, but alarmist crap like this doesn't help your cause. Did John Kerry start working for the dot?

RFA. The report clearly is talking about flooding due to more severe weather. Which is a claimed product of global warming. With the case in point being both JDK and Newark Liberty having closed as a result of - wait for it - flooding during Sandy.

Slashdot Top Deals

The only perfect science is hind-sight.