Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment I wrote a few lines of code... (Score 1) 80

I installed 100 surveillance cameras in my warehouse, which means I hired 100 "employees" to watch over my warehouse.

See how stupid this sounds?

AI agents, regardless of their sophistication, are not employees. They are tools to be used by employees, even if only one employee is using them. Hell, even if an AI agent controls another AI agent, they're both tools, and neither is an actual employee, even if they do work that was once done by an employee.

Comment Re:seems normal (Score 1) 65

Since the company has access to all your emails, you'd think it would be trivial for them to ask an LLM to "Give me the top five accomplishments made by each employee over the past 12 months, and at the end give me a recommendation on who I should promote and who I should let go."

Of course, that means smart employees will send emails like "So, looks like I can single-handedly save the company $1M/day with this awesome idea I came up with."

Comment Re:Why only 24 months of monitoring (Score 1) 26

"Monitoring" is all but useless once a malicious actor opens a new account in your name. With persistence you may be able to reverse the damage to your credit, but you have to put in the effort yourself because the credit monitoring companies and credit reporting agencies sure won't do it of their own accord. And even if you manage to set the record straight, *somebody* has to pay for all the purchases made on the fraudulent credit cards obtained in your name before they were shut down. In the end, we all pay.

The solution isn't credit monitoring, but better controls on your account to begin with.

Comment Not necessarily Disney data (Score 1) 42

The legal notice says Google has copied a "large corpus" of Disney's works to train its gen AI models, which is believable, as Google's image and video models will happily produce popular Disney characters -- they couldn't do that without feeding the models lots of Disney data.

Not true. Google could have fed the models data produced by other people, e.g. fan fiction, parodies, etc. (But, that being said, we all know that Google probably did feed their models with actual Disney content, wink-wink.)

Slashdot Top Deals

It seems intuitively obvious to me, which means that it might be wrong. -- Chris Torek

Working...