Comment Re:Co-Conspirators (Score 1) 339
Comment Re: His identity (Score 1) 99
Comment Re: His identity (Score 1) 99
Comment Re: That was my second thought (Score 2) 350
Comment Re:yes they should (Score 2) 1081
Comment stuff them (Score 1) 188
Comment Vaporware much?? (Score 1) 128
Comment Re:What about Netcraft? (Score 1) 152
Comment Re:Nonsense. (Score 1) 292
Comment Re:Physical items? (Score 1) 292
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinking_of_the_Rainbow_Warrior
Comment Re:Physical items? (Score 2) 292
First the current act of NZ Parliament in this case is the Search and Surveillance Act 2012, not 2009 as you cite.
Further in the current act. 113 Powers of persons called to assist
(1) Every person called on to assist a person exercising a search power is subject to the control of the person with overall responsibility for exercising that power.
(2)..(j)copy any document, or part of a document, that the person exercising the power has determined may be lawfully copied.
In this case the FBI can not exceed the powers of the NZ Police. The NZ Court procedure was for the evidence to be held in safe custody until a court hearing was to decide if the FBI would be given any access at all. The NZ Police Officer left the FBI in an evidence room without any supervision at which point the FBI cloned the 18 hard dives and left the building and sent them to the USA via FedEX WITHOUT permission from the NZ Police. This is absolutely illegal. The NZ Police had no legal standing to override the NZ Courts decision for due process to decide if the FBI would be granted access, ergo the FBI had no legal basis for carrying out their illegal acts of copyright infringement and contempt of court on New Zealand soil.
Time for the FBI agents to be arrested for committing a crime in New Zealand. We arrested and sent French secret agents to jail for violating NZ Laws in the Rainbow Worrior bombing in the past. There as absolutely no good reason the FBI should believe they can act above the law in New Zealand and get away with it!!!!!
Comment Re:Physical items? (Score 1) 292
Search and Surveillance Bill 2009 108 (j) (i): "Every search power authorises the person exercising it to use any reasonable measures to create a forensic copy of any material in such a computer system or other data storage device."
Yeah, it might appear that the NZ Police would have been authorized to make a legal copy but that is not what happened. The FBI where left in a room with the evidence and before the NZ Police officer got back to the room they took copies and left, without telling the officer, and shipped the cloned hard drives back to the USA via FedEX.
The FBI has clearly broken the sovereign rights of New Zealand here and also failed to comply with a New Zealand court procedure that demanded that the defense would be granted a court hearing to decide if the FBI would be given any rights at all to the data. The FBI agents should be charged with an offense and NZ should demand they be extradited back to New Zealand for a court hearing to face charges of illegal copyright infringement and contempt of court.
Comment Re:Not infringement (Score 1) 292
Comment Re:Nonsense. (Score 1) 292
No evidence was made unavailable to the defense.
In fact that is exactly what has happened in this case. Before the extradition hearing due in August the FBI instructed the NZ Police and Crown Law office to argue in court that the defense should not have access to any existence. The latest ruling by the judge overruled the FBI's request and said that under the New Zealand Bill of Rights the defense should have access to all the information that has to date been denied to them.