Agreed.
I’ve been on OpenAPS for 6 years now, and it revolutionized my life. The FDA is starting to catch up, but my home brew system is still better than what’s coming out next.
This seems like a step backwards.
If you're worried about getting uniquely identified by your browser, you may want to read or listen to this episode of Security Now:
http://www.grc.com/sn/sn-264.htm
More than a version control system, I think that the law needs a bug management system that people can use to put bugs in regarding language that's too open, phrases that allow "security flaws" and other interpretations that were not what the authors intended, etc.
I wonder if this can be used for the diabetic crowd, who typically end up with constantly changing prescriptions due to their sugar levels.
So, most people see the choice as this: either buy the product as its offered and accept its limitations, or go to the black market to get what you want and send a message to the producer that their product is not acceptable.
And therein lies the false dichotomy. There's another option:
DON'T OBTAIN THE MATERIAL.
You don't need the movie that much. You can choose neither, and still send the message that the product is not acceptable.
I keep wondering, why wouldn't the SSD bring back the 5 1/4" form factor? They could shove more in the space, and make bigger SSD desktop drives.
Is there any reason why the 5 1/4" size would cause issues like it causes slowness for a rotating platter?
Are you having fun yet?
