Comment Re:What about KDE (Score 1) 91
Konqeror is nice, but: 1) Doesn't have the backing of multimilion dollar companies behined it, for marketing and development.
Agreed...but I feel this is a good thing. The direction of development should not be heavily effected by a few key companies...or one company for that matter.
2) Doesn't have integrated software installation/maintainence.
True...but currently gnome has no polished product either. Eventually, KDE will have one as well. The key difference is that KDE's maintainence program will not be best suited for a RedHat system. With RedHat's influence on Eazel, I'm not confident Eazel will be a general Unix tool...not just linux...or RedHat.
3) I prefer Gtk+ :)
I know it's just preference, but wow.... I can't stand heavy Object oriented programming in C. It feels like such a hack to me. Granted there's gtk-- if I really felt that inclined, but I'm definitely a qt fan:)
Agreed...but I feel this is a good thing. The direction of development should not be heavily effected by a few key companies...or one company for that matter.
2) Doesn't have integrated software installation/maintainence.
True...but currently gnome has no polished product either. Eventually, KDE will have one as well. The key difference is that KDE's maintainence program will not be best suited for a RedHat system. With RedHat's influence on Eazel, I'm not confident Eazel will be a general Unix tool...not just linux...or RedHat.
3) I prefer Gtk+
I know it's just preference, but wow.... I can't stand heavy Object oriented programming in C. It feels like such a hack to me. Granted there's gtk-- if I really felt that inclined, but I'm definitely a qt fan:)
