Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Great. :( (Score 1) 484

I'd rather be a bottom-feeder than someone who pays twice what I do for the same hardware and calls it an "experience".

If you had used Apple hardware for any length of time, you would understand "the experience" for which many users are willing to pay a premium.

If you tick off the individual components on a specifications sheet, you might see "the same hardware". Everyday use tells a different story. Take an Apple laptop as an example. As a long time ThinkPad user, I'm familiar with the feel of quality hardware, and the build quality of Apple's laptops make the ThinkPad feel creaky and rickety. I had long ago realized the value of paying a premium for a ThinkPad over a consumer Dell or Acer or Toshiba, etc. But now, after using Apple hardware (even to run Linux or Windows), a ThinkPad for roughly the same premium isn't even a consideration.

You may pay half as much for your hardware, but for me, it's worth paying a premium knowing I have something that will last. Not to mention the rather solid unix OS that comes bundled with it.

Comment Re:Screw it!!! (Score 1) 357

Look around. Do you see private companies lining up to fund Moon travel?

No, it's far too dangerous.

Believe me, if Boeing or General Electric or United Airlines (those seem like the most obvious candidates off the top of my head; I'm sure there are many others) thought there was a profit in it, they'd be lobbying like mad for whatever regulatory changes would be necessary, and simultaneously developing well-publicized plans. Instead we have the absurdly misnamed "Virgin Galactic" planning suborbital hops at some point in the unspecified future -- and as much money as the Branson empire represents, the truth is that when it comes to projects of this scale, Virgin Everything is a bit player.

Indeed, Virgin Galactic is a big player. With their assets, they could certainly build the necessary launch facilities where regulations are not an issue. But...

Yes, eventually the technology will improve to the point that corporate investors will see a short-term profit potential, and at that point the dollars will start flowing in. But it is going to take massive government investment to get us there. As long as the US is dragging its feet, we'd better hope that the EU or Russia or China can step up, because otherwise we are just not going to see people on the Moon again in our lifetimes.

As long as the US, EU, Russia and China keep wasting time and money on the prospect of manned flight, technology will NOT improve to the point that corporate investors will see a short-term profit potential. We need to hash out the details of the interplanetary medium before we start blasting people into it. We need to fund unmanned exploration before we start blasting humans into the radiation. Sure, it might be fun to watch. But until you understand it, good luck.

Comment Re:Excellent news (Score 1) 162

In many ways, Kontact is a great PIM. In my experience it seems faster and more polished than Evolution or Thunderbird/Sunbird. Unfortunately, its IMAP support is a bit clunky. According to the one of the devs, until KMail has been moved to the Akonadi back end it is impossible to search across multiple IMAP folders (see http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-search-multiple-IMAP-folders-in-a-single-search--td16188937.html ). With 5+ IMAP accounts, it's extremely convenient (necessary?) to define a search folder, call it "Inbox", that polls all IMAP Inboxes for new mail. The same applies for sent mail, etc. It's likely not an issue for most users, but it's something that works flawlessly in other full featured PIM/email clients. For now I'm stuck using slower, uglier PIMs because of a lack of basic IMAP search functionality in KMail. Until it's resolved I'd hesitate to call Kontact "streets ahead" of either Thunderbird, Evolution, or Outlook.

Slashdot Top Deals

Real Users know your home telephone number.

Working...