Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:I use gemini (Score 1) 105

Yep. I've read that generative AI doesn't say "I don't know the answer," but will just make something up instead.

I wanted to see how helpful Gen AI would be for an edge case to sort through a collection of heroes I have in a game I play. Right off the bat, I learned Gemini is the "most accurate." Anthropic was beyond worthless, OpenAI was maybe 50/50. Even so, I learned to Gemini's data before accepting its results. It definitely did not do as well as I originally thought, so I make sure it knows the stats of the players before I ask for recommendations on how to manage hero list

Comment Hallucinations et al. (Score 0) 40

In my daily life, I don't see a lot of people being aware of hallucinating AI agents. Some skepticism, some raving "oh my god this is amazing!" but I don't hear a lot of "cautiousness about results," so I've been a bit more vocal when appropriate.

That being said, there are plenty of edge case uses where AI agents completely fail. I'm still in the middle of testing the usefulness of Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini in a specific situation. I'm trying to see if it can help me decide which characters in a mobile game I'm playing are worth keeping and not. I haven't had the time to really delve, but right from the beginning Claude is the worst. It couldn't give me anything more than generalities about the game. ChatGPT and Gemini were incorrect in labeling one or two characters, so I need to really spend more time determining how well they know the stats of all them.

Slashdot Top Deals

There is no royal road to geometry. -- Euclid

Working...