Are you "a company established outside the EU and is offering goods/services (paid or for free) or is monitoring the behaviour of individuals in the EU."? If so, yes.

A plain reading of the GDPR scope clearly indicates that it apples to Clearview. The big question will be how the EU intends to enforce the penalties it seeks.

That has literally nothing to do with Apple Pay, and seems to have been an issue with the App Store billing.

Epic makes and supports an app store, Epic Games Store. Epic famously has leveraged its size to purchase smaller game developers and then withdraw their content from competing app stores to run as an exclusive in their own app store. They also practice distributing free games exclusively on their app store and not competing app stores, using funds from their game development business to distort and undercut competitors in the game store business. Epic is absolutely behaving with anti-competitive behavior as well here

This is a product to do installment payments at third-parties via Apple Pay. Apple's various payment plans for it's own first party products (iPhone upgrade program, Apple Card monthly installments) are not affected, and are still 0% interest.

The first stage (the booster) doesn't ever really see the plasma-creating speeds that necessitate complicated heat management. It's supersonic, but nothing blistering. Its only real job is to get above the majority of the atmosphere. The second stage ("Starship", the payload carrying bit) is where you gain speed quickly and what suffers through the worst of re-entry. Industry standard design generally uses "sacrificial" ablative tiles that create a layer of protective gas as they burn away. They're extremely effective and reliable, but as a consumable item, they're not a viable choice for SpaceX's goal of full re-usability.

> Okay, well, in Canada they're trying to give people up to 2 years in prison for speaking positively about fossil fuels. Welcome to 1984. Stop voting for liberals and establishment shill Republicans.

[citation-fucking-needed]

Vowles is the new head of the team. He recently took the position after being one of the key leaders in the previously dominant Mercedes. He knows a thing or two about how to be successful in Formula 1, and is absolutely in a position to assess and redirect his new team's organizational efforts in any way he sees fit.

Baffled at how this is moderated as Informative. > I seem to recall a recent story about how Apple essentially forces you to buy iCloud storage space [slashdot.org]. Well, they also bundle that with Apple Music. Oh, you're out of space on iCloud? (You will be, since Apple has never increased the available space since launch, just added new and more expensive tiers.) Well, for a small monthly fee, you can get enough space to back up your phone and Apple Music. Apple Music (and Spotify) are streaming services. Other than songs you explicitly cache locally, neither service stores anything either on your device or in your iCloud Storage. The songs that are cached locally are not included in any device backups. Apple Music has zero impact on your iCloud Storage capacity and is a wholly unrelated product except for the fact that you can subscribe to both Apple Music and an increased iCloud Storage quota (and other Apple services) via the Apple One bundle. You're more than welcome to back up your phone to a local machine (Windows or Mac), wirelessly even, and manage your own backups privately. If you don't want to be reminded that you're out of iCloud storage space, stop putting things in iCloud Storage?

"I reject all of your considered evidence, and offer none of my own" It's a bold debate strategy, but unless you have something concrete to actually claim, you're not really contributing.

The headline itself is the link?

Apple will recycle their products for free. Just drop it off, or they'll send you a free postage-paid box to use. https://www.apple.com/recyclin...

I believe that's still supported by AirPlay. AirPlay 2 covers a bunch of related things working together, but the marquee feature was improved streaming syncs to support multiroom audio. I don't have access to an official spec, it's confidential, but there are portions that have been reverse engineered, and the core function is ultimately passing around an rtsp link. In some cases, that can be direct from a public source, in others it's a private stream initiated by the sending device. The basics are functionally the same as Google or Sonos's implementations, in a heterogeneous house you won't really notice the difference. In an Apple household, you can do fun things like audio from almost anything, to almost anything. Apple TV to the speakers in the other room, iPhone to multiple rooms, a pair of HomePods paired to act as a left/right stereo, Apple TV to AirPods at night, etc.

I'm frankly baffled. A TV with ARC and/or a receiver with HDMI switching have been utterly standard gear for the past 15 years or more. Somehow this person managed to find the only 4k TV without ARC, is still using a receiver that doesn't support HDMI, and is unwilling to upgrade either one. But it's easier to complain that the latest greatest Apple TV is designed around modern home theaters.

That's not how AirPlay works... Whenever possible, it hands off a streaming link and then does a timesync to play content directly on the target device, exactly like how "Chromecast and similar protocols" work.