Comment Re:The 18-year-old Rubyist isn't a good programmer (Score 1) 352
In other words, get off my lawn?
In other words, get off my lawn?
YESSSSSSSSSS
Ahh, ghetto programmers, gotta love 'em.
Engrossing story! Thanks for the details, sounds like a fascinatingly different place.
KAHHHHHHHHHHHHNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN!
This text provided to offset the ridiculous amount of capital letters.
The built-in functionality of Visual Studio is pathetic when compared to that of Eclipse.
Corporate policies can - or are you suggesting ingore your company's policy?
If a company has issues with you "breaking corporate policy" because you install Firefox on your machine, then that's one more reason to quit.
Just sayin'.
Gramer != Speling
I can write unmaintainable shitty Java code. The language doesn't prevent me from being a complete idiot.
Want to watch?
Yeah, I love seeing awful code, please post a sample. The worse it is, the better it is.
C/C++ is for the pros, for hobbyist it is probably better to stick with Visual Basic, C#, Java, Ruby, Perl, Python, PHP, Automator etc.
LOL, I guess everyone who programs web apps and services for a living is a hobbyist.
PHP is pseudo-OO. It's a little bit of everything, all thrown into one messy pot. It's OK for quick and dirty apps, but I'd take Java over PHP any day.
At this point, assembler is the best solution for very few things. Programmers generally output a pretty constant amount of code, regardless of the language they're using. So using something like Java or C# or C++ or Ruby or Python, where 1 line of code equals dozens of assembler instructions, is insanely more productive.
Only in a software-hardware interface, or when speed absolutely has to be maximized, is assembler the best choice.
I came, I saw, I deleted all your files.