We have DST, but only some states. But the sun coming up at 4:45am in summer sucks up near the tropics and makes no sense.
Well, this particular discussion is about a (not yet enacted) law concerning DST in the United States, and none of the states are in the topics except Hawaii, which does not use DST.
You can't change the universe, nor the solar system. There's very specific reasons why the Sun reaches its zenith(daily peak) at mid day(12:00).
The sun does not reach its zenith at 12:00.
If you defined noon as the time of the sun reaching its zenith, days would no longer be the same length. Days in northern hemisphere winter would be slightly longer than 24 hours, and days in northern hemisphere summer would be shorter, due to the difference between sidereal time and solar time.
Driving to work in darkness, schoolchildren crossing streets, in winter.
When the daylight hours are short in winter, you have to pick some time in which it's darkness. If it's light during the morning commute, it will be dark during the evening commute.
This depends on how far north you are, of course.
"Permanent Daylight Savings Time" is a misnomer.
What it actually is, is that the standard time in every location in the US is shifted one time zone to the west, and the clocks stay on standard time all year.
Most US population centers are in places east of the point in their time zones where the sun is overhead (or due south) at noon,
Unless I'm misreading the map, on the East coast, the EST time zone is pretty much centered on where it should be, with New York very slightly east and Washington DC very slightly west of center. The main problem with EST is that it extends west to the city limits of Chicago, while it should change to CST around Toledo.
If anything, most of the population in the US is slightly to the western edge of the time zones, not the east.
Here's the article's actual answer to the question (not in the summary): "The most affected jobs are secretaries, are routine clerks," said Michelle Yin, one of the working paper's authors...
Secretarial jobs were already cataclysmically wiped out by the word processing/computer revolution. It's hard to remember anymore how ubiquitous secretaries were to businesses.
However, turns out that this previous revolution didn't reduce the workforce, because the number of IT support personnel required increased directly as the number of secretaries decreased.
to joe biden and lina khan. trump admin must not have gotten a proper bribe to kill this.
Actually Trump is personally behind the right to repair. From Google:
In this case, OP was correct. The FTC action against John Deere was filed during the Biden administration when Lina Khan was FTC chair.
https://apnews.com/article/dee...
...The Turing engine calculates
and simulates a self inside
and says the things a thinking self says
but when it said “I think,” it lied.
I will refer you back to my original comment for details.
I was addressing your comment about heat rejection, a subject on which I have some amount of expertise. If you have objections to the proposed space data systems other than your comment about radiators, go start a new thread.
So your answer is to launch massive radiators that can be seen with the naked eye from the ground.
No, the approach would be to launch massive solar panels that can be seen with the naked eye from the ground.
The solar panels would do double duty as radiators.
So you don't see generating massive amounts of heat, with nowhere to dump it besides passive radiation into a vacuum as a problem. Go on, what's the solution for that?
Radiators.
Since the heat out at most equals the solar power in, and the two-sided flat-plate equilibrium temperature of a panel receiving solar energy is 331K (58 C), if the solar panels are also the radiators, heat rejection is manageable.
(Completely accurate only far from the Earth. In Low Earth Orbit, you also have to account for albedo and infrared radiation from the Earth.)
Ribosomes do a job a bit more complicated than "catalyze reactions."
...except for all of the 36 enzymes we borrowed from another living cell,
And ribosomes.
So, they took apart living e-coli cells, purified the pieces, and put the pieces together. To make something not as good as what they started with.
(the summary seemed to imply that ribosomes are enzymes. They're not.)
Some people have a great ambition: to build something that will last, at least until they've finished building it.
