Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:GBIC's Still To Expensive (Score 1) 87

Having worked in IT only for SMBs, I didn't know much about FCoE so in that sense TFA and these comments are quite informative for me. That said, I don't anticipate deploying FCoE (or any type of FC) anytime soon since we don't have a need for the FC-specific benefits. I am in the process of building a new server room for an office relocation, and have already designed the LAN access/distribution layers using Catalysts using 10GbE trunks to the core. I have to agree that GBICs are way too expensive--especially when implementing 10GbE functionality on the 2960 series switches. I don't have the numbers, but IIRC the total cost for the required modules and SFPs was actually close to the base switches themselves! Then, Cisco charges an arm and a leg just to stack their switches... Granted, you pay for what you get, and Cisco is [arguably] the premium for network hardware... but I can't help feeling a lot of the high cost is just not warranted. Personally, instead of FCoE, I wish Cisco would drive 10GbE (and other Ethernet-enhancing features, proprietary or not) costs down and make it more affordable for smaller shops and enthusiasts.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Most of us, when all is said and done, like what we like and make up reasons for it afterwards." -- Soren F. Petersen

Working...