Comment And also (Score 1) 24
CGI? Animations?
I hear rumors that the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park were not real dinosaurs, but merely computer simulated to save money.
CGI? Animations?
I hear rumors that the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park were not real dinosaurs, but merely computer simulated to save money.
Another brick in the wall.
Isnt Google trained on the same lyrics? Can you search for a line and find a page with all of it?
Google is completely untrustworthy when it comes to politics. I stopped even trying.
Example: Some crazies claimed that there were no rapes as part of the October 7th, attack. I saw plenty of pictures of it back then. Even widely shared images are now completely gone.
If you lie to people, they stop listening.
Convenience depends on what you do. But EVs are are much more reliable and safer than gas cars.
So the ice age 20.000 years age was the humans fault? Ehat about all the bufallos and other mammals farting their way through life?
Why are there no conservative professors? Seems to me the protesters should be first in line to have their horizons expanded.
Ofcourse there are no no-go zones inthe UK. Little girls are for indtance always welcome into the muslim areas.
Are you saying this is justice?
There was a trial actually, because someone on the Everquest team said they included the DIKUmud code. DIKU team lost for lack of evidence.
The only one who wants a war is Putin. But war is upon us, and the only two ways it ends is a win or a loss. We want to win.
It used to be 30 though.
The Gulf of Denmark!
Herz decision was about resale value. When Elon dropped prices, they lost a lot of money. Seeing that he might do it again, they are abandoning evâ(TM)s altogether.
Understandable. But also short sighted.
But you don't go around assigning "normal" label to everything that is normal. The "normal" people didn't ask for this. And do not apply it in daily use.
Wrong.
If you describe someone as heterosexual, which statistically speaking, is the norm, it is not considered a slur, and is regularly used.
You're trying to turn a personal discomfort of yours into some kind of objective truth, and it's transparent and pathetic.
You will notice, that this is not something that was in use, even back in Latin Rome.
The prefix cis? Of course it was.
Do you mean just in the context of gender? If so, then you really are a fucking moron.
Knowledge that your brain was the source of your intelligence also wasn't known "back in Latin Rome". Doesn't make it less biologically true.
The reason being that in order to communicate fast and easily, the most used words are usually short, and superfluous words are excluded, and only the exceptions are mentioned. As in homosexual, which is the exception to normal sexuality.
And yet the word heterosexual exists, has been in use for quite some time, and nobody has labeled it a slur.
The premise of your argument is absurd.
See also Huffman codes and the Zip algorithm if any of that rings a bell. It is also how our brain stores information. By simply ignoring the things that are common.
I'm a BSCS. The idea that the brain stores information in a way anything like a Huffman code is fucking patently absurd.
You are desperately grasping for anything to justify your mislabeling a technical descriptor as a slur. It's fucking weak.
Well, why do you think you remember less and less of every day? Why does it take longer the first time you walk a route? Because the brain just stores reference to prior experiences. This is how the zip algorithm work basically. Implementations may wary.
Now I don't think people in Rome labelled themselves cisgender. In fact, I see no evidence of this ever occurring in history. Anywhere. Transgender people have existed since before we were humans. And yet, only now they have a need to label the rest of us. No thank you.
The rest of your post is.. well confusing I must say. I don't think you understood what I said.
"It might help if we ran the MBA's out of Washington." -- Admiral Grace Hopper